From 6057cb3bff9ccf2372276cece4c52af957693615 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Dagfinn=20Ilmari=20Manns=C3=A5ker?= Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2023 20:30:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 12/13] doc: fix typo "formattings" in rangedypes docs --- doc/src/sgml/rangetypes.sgml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/rangetypes.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/rangetypes.sgml index 92ea0e83da..7826865740 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/rangetypes.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/rangetypes.sgml @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ for example the integer ranges [1, 7] and [1, 8), must be identical. It doesn't matter which representation you choose to be the canonical one, so long as two equivalent values with - different formattings are always mapped to the same value with the same + different formatting are always mapped to the same value with the same formatting. In addition to adjusting the inclusive/exclusive bounds format, a canonicalization function might round off boundary values, in case the desired step size is larger than what the subtype is capable of -- 2.39.2