From 2a783e5ce456695ce5ab6da02eab151b655c9597 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:35:28 -0500
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/14] EXPLAIN Bitmap table scan also count no visible
 tuple pages

Previously, bitmap heap scans only counted lossy and exact pages for
explain when there was at least one visible tuple on the page.

heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block() returned true only if there was a
"valid" page with tuples to be processed. However, the lossy and exact
page counters in EXPLAIN should count the number of pages represented in
a lossy or non-lossy way in the constructed bitmap, regardless of
whether or not the pages ultimately contained visible tuples.
---
 src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c     | 15 ++++++++++-----
 src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out |  4 +++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
index 61ffc8d0ee8..38b4596a775 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
@@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
 
 	for (;;)
 	{
+		bool valid;
+
 		CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
 
 		/*
@@ -230,17 +232,20 @@ BitmapHeapNext(BitmapHeapScanState *node)
 
 			BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator(node, tbmres->blockno);
 
-			if (!table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, tbmres))
-			{
-				/* AM doesn't think this block is valid, skip */
-				continue;
-			}
+			valid = table_scan_bitmap_next_block(scan, tbmres);
 
 			if (tbmres->ntuples >= 0)
 				node->exact_pages++;
 			else
 				node->lossy_pages++;
 
+			if (!valid)
+			{
+				/* AM doesn't think this block is valid, skip */
+				continue;
+			}
+
+
 			/* Adjust the prefetch target */
 			BitmapAdjustPrefetchTarget(node);
 		}
diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
index bf0657b9f2c..9c20a24982f 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_prune.out
@@ -2848,6 +2848,7 @@ update ab_a1 set b = 3 from ab where ab.a = 1 and ab.a = ab_a1.a;
                            Index Cond: (a = 1)
                ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on ab_a1_b3 ab_a1_3 (actual rows=0 loops=1)
                      Recheck Cond: (a = 1)
+                     Heap Blocks: exact=1
                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on ab_a1_b3_a_idx (actual rows=1 loops=1)
                            Index Cond: (a = 1)
          ->  Materialize (actual rows=1 loops=1)
@@ -2863,9 +2864,10 @@ update ab_a1 set b = 3 from ab where ab.a = 1 and ab.a = ab_a1.a;
                                  Index Cond: (a = 1)
                      ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on ab_a1_b3 ab_3 (actual rows=0 loops=1)
                            Recheck Cond: (a = 1)
+                           Heap Blocks: exact=1
                            ->  Bitmap Index Scan on ab_a1_b3_a_idx (actual rows=1 loops=1)
                                  Index Cond: (a = 1)
-(34 rows)
+(36 rows)
 
 table ab;
  a | b 
-- 
2.40.1

