[PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses

Started by Nikolay Shaplovover 6 years ago5 messages
#1Nikolay Shaplov
dhyan@nataraj.su
1 attachment(s)

This thread is a follow up to the thread /messages/by-id/2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m where I've been trying to remove StdRdOptions
structure and replace it with unique structure for each relation kind.

I've decided to split that patch into smaller parts.

This part adds some asserts to ViewOptions macroses.
Since an option pointer there is converted into (ViewOptions *) it would be
really good to make sure that this macros is called in proper context, and we
do the convertation properly. At least when running tests with asserts turned
on.

--
Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da
Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing (Russian)

Attachments:

some-asserts-for-view-options-macroses_v1.difftext/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name=some-asserts-for-view-options-macroses_v1.diffDownload
diff --git a/src/include/utils/rel.h b/src/include/utils/rel.h
index a5cf804..b24fb1d 100644
--- a/src/include/utils/rel.h
+++ b/src/include/utils/rel.h
@@ -351,9 +351,10 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
  *		Returns whether the relation is security view, or not.  Note multiple
  *		eval of argument!
  */
-#define RelationIsSecurityView(relation)	\
-	((relation)->rd_options ?				\
-	 ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->security_barrier : false)
+#define RelationIsSecurityView(relation)									\
+	(AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW),				\
+	 ((relation)->rd_options ?												\
+	  ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->security_barrier : false))
 
 /*
  * RelationHasCheckOption
@@ -361,9 +362,10 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
  *		or the cascaded check option.  Note multiple eval of argument!
  */
 #define RelationHasCheckOption(relation)									\
+	(AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW),				\
 	((relation)->rd_options &&												\
 	 ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->check_option !=				\
-	 VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_NOT_SET)
+	 VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_NOT_SET))
 
 /*
  * RelationHasLocalCheckOption
@@ -371,9 +373,10 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
  *		option.  Note multiple eval of argument!
  */
 #define RelationHasLocalCheckOption(relation)								\
+	(AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW),				\
 	((relation)->rd_options &&												\
 	 ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->check_option ==				\
-	 VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_LOCAL)
+	 VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_LOCAL))
 
 /*
  * RelationHasCascadedCheckOption
@@ -381,9 +384,10 @@ typedef struct ViewOptions
  *		option.  Note multiple eval of argument!
  */
 #define RelationHasCascadedCheckOption(relation)							\
+	(AssertMacro(relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_VIEW),				\
 	((relation)->rd_options &&												\
 	 ((ViewOptions *) (relation)->rd_options)->check_option ==				\
-	  VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_CASCADED)
+	  VIEW_OPTION_CHECK_OPTION_CASCADED))
 
 /*
  * RelationIsValid
#2Robert Haas
robertmhaas@gmail.com
In reply to: Nikolay Shaplov (#1)
Re: [PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses

On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan@nataraj.su> wrote:

This thread is a follow up to the thread /messages/by-id/2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m where I've been trying to remove StdRdOptions
structure and replace it with unique structure for each relation kind.

I've decided to split that patch into smaller parts.

This part adds some asserts to ViewOptions macroses.
Since an option pointer there is converted into (ViewOptions *) it would be
really good to make sure that this macros is called in proper context, and we
do the convertation properly. At least when running tests with asserts turned
on.

Seems like a good idea. Should we try to do something similar for the
macros in that header file that cast to StdRdOptions?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

#3Nikolay Shaplov
dhyan@nataraj.su
In reply to: Robert Haas (#2)
Re: [PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses

В письме от понедельник, 7 октября 2019 г. 12:59:27 MSK пользователь Robert
Haas написал:

This thread is a follow up to the thread
/messages/by-id/2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m where I've
been trying to remove StdRdOptions structure and replace it with unique
structure for each relation kind.

I've decided to split that patch into smaller parts.

This part adds some asserts to ViewOptions macroses.
Since an option pointer there is converted into (ViewOptions *) it would
be
really good to make sure that this macros is called in proper context, and
we do the convertation properly. At least when running tests with asserts
turned on.

Seems like a good idea. Should we try to do something similar for the
macros in that header file that cast to StdRdOptions?

That would not be as easy as for ViewOptions. For example as for the current
master code, fillfactor from StdRdOptions is used in Toast, Heap, Hash index,
nbtree index, and spgist index. This will make RelationGetFillFactor macros a
bit complicated for example.

Now I have patches that limits usage of StdRdOptions to Heap and Toast.

When StdRdOptions is not that widely used, we whould be able to add asserts
for it, it will not make the code too complex.

So I would suggest to do ViewOptions asserts now, and keep dealing with
StdRdOptions for later. When we are finished with my current patches, I will
take care about it.

--
Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da
Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing (Russian)

#4Peter Eisentraut
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Nikolay Shaplov (#3)
Re: [PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses

On 2019-10-08 12:44, Nikolay Shaplov wrote:

В письме от понедельник, 7 октября 2019 г. 12:59:27 MSK пользователь Robert
Haas написал:

This thread is a follow up to the thread
/messages/by-id/2620882.s52SJui4ql@x200m where I've
been trying to remove StdRdOptions structure and replace it with unique
structure for each relation kind.

I've decided to split that patch into smaller parts.

This part adds some asserts to ViewOptions macroses.
Since an option pointer there is converted into (ViewOptions *) it would
be
really good to make sure that this macros is called in proper context, and
we do the convertation properly. At least when running tests with asserts
turned on.

Committed.

I simplified the parentheses by one level from your patch.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

#5Nikolay Shaplov
dhyan@nataraj.su
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#4)
Re: [PATCH] Add some useful asserts into View Options macroses

В письме от пятница, 1 ноября 2019 г. 13:29:58 MSK пользователь Peter
Eisentraut написал:

Committed.

I simplified the parentheses by one level from your patch.

Thank you!

--
Software Developer: https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~014a87e140ff02c0da
Body-oriented Therapist: https://vk.com/nataraj_rebalancing (Russian)