Review of pg_rewind

Started by Samrat Revagadeabout 12 years ago3 messages
#1Samrat Revagade
revagade.samrat@gmail.com

While testing pg_rewind I encountered following problem.
I used following process to do the testing, Please correct me if I am doing
it in wrong way.

Problem-1:
pg_rewind gives error (target master must be shut down cleanly.) when
master crashed unexpectedly.

1. Setup Streaming Replication (stand alone machine : master server port
-5432, standby server port-5433 )
2. Do some operation on master server:
postgres=# create table test(id int);
3. Crash the Postgres process of master:
kill -9 [pid of postgres process of master server]
4. Promote standby server
5. Run pg_rewind:
$ /samrat/postgresql/contrib/pg_rewind/pg_rewind -D
/samrat/master-data/ --source-server='host=localhost port=5433
dbname=postgres' -v
connected to remote server
fetched file "global/pg_control", length 8192
target master must be shut down cleanly.
6. Check masters control information:
$ /samrat/postgresql/install/bin/pg_controldata
/samrat/master-data/ | grep "Database cluster state"
Database cluster state: in production

IIUC It is because pg_rewind does some checks before resynchronizing the
PostgreSQL data directories.
But In real time scenarios, for example due to hardware failure if master
crashed and its controldata shows the state "in production" then pg_rewind
will fail to pass this check.

Problem-2:
For zero length WAL record pf_rewind gives error.

1. Setup Streaming Replication (stand alone machine : master server port
-5432, standby server port-5433 )
2. Cleanly shutdown master (Do not add any data on master)
3. Promote standby server
4. Create table on new master (promoted standby)
postgres=# create table test(id int);
5. Run pg_rewind:
$ /samrat/postgresql/contrib/pg_rewind/pg_rewind -D
/samrat/master-data/ --source-server='host=localhost port=5433
connected to remote server
connected to remote server
fetched file "global/pg_control", length 8192
fetched file "pg_xlog/00000002.history", length 41
Last common WAL position: 0/4000090 on timeline 1
could not previous WAL record at 0/4000090: record with zero
length at 0/4000090

Also it as you already listed in README of pg_rewind the it has a problem
of tablespace support.

I will continue with testing it further to help in improving it :)

#2Michael Paquier
michael.paquier@gmail.com
In reply to: Samrat Revagade (#1)
Re: Review of pg_rewind

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. Btw, pg_rewind is not a project included in
Postgres core as a contrib module or anything, so could you send your
feedback and the issues you find directly on github instead? The URL
of the project is https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind.

Either way, here are some comments below...

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samrat Revagade
<revagade.samrat@gmail.com> wrote:

While testing pg_rewind I encountered following problem.
I used following process to do the testing, Please correct me if I am doing
it in wrong way.

Problem-1:
pg_rewind gives error (target master must be shut down cleanly.) when
master crashed unexpectedly.

1. Setup Streaming Replication (stand alone machine : master server port
-5432, standby server port-5433 )
2. Do some operation on master server:
postgres=# create table test(id int);
3. Crash the Postgres process of master:
kill -9 [pid of postgres process of master server]
4. Promote standby server
5. Run pg_rewind:
$ /samrat/postgresql/contrib/pg_rewind/pg_rewind -D
/samrat/master-data/ --source-server='host=localhost port=5433
dbname=postgres' -v
connected to remote server
fetched file "global/pg_control", length 8192
target master must be shut down cleanly.
6. Check masters control information:
$ /samrat/postgresql/install/bin/pg_controldata
/samrat/master-data/ | grep "Database cluster state"
Database cluster state: in production

IIUC It is because pg_rewind does some checks before resynchronizing the
PostgreSQL data directories.
But In real time scenarios, for example due to hardware failure if master
crashed and its controldata shows the state "in production" then pg_rewind
will fail to pass this check.

Yeah, you could call that a limitation of this module. When I looked
at its code some time ago, I had on top of my mind the addition of an
option of the type --force that could attempt resynchronization of a
master even if it did not shut down correctly.

Problem-2:
For zero length WAL record pf_rewind gives error.

1. Setup Streaming Replication (stand alone machine : master server port
-5432, standby server port-5433 )
2. Cleanly shutdown master (Do not add any data on master)
3. Promote standby server
4. Create table on new master (promoted standby)
postgres=# create table test(id int);
5. Run pg_rewind:
$ /samrat/postgresql/contrib/pg_rewind/pg_rewind -D
/samrat/master-data/ --source-server='host=localhost port=5433
connected to remote server
connected to remote server
fetched file "global/pg_control", length 8192
fetched file "pg_xlog/00000002.history", length 41
Last common WAL position: 0/4000090 on timeline 1
could not previous WAL record at 0/4000090: record with zero length
at 0/4000090

This is rather interesting. When I tested it I did not find this error.

Also it as you already listed in README of pg_rewind the it has a problem of
tablespace support.

I will continue with testing it further to help in improving it :)

Thanks!
--
Michael

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#3Samrat Revagade
revagade.samrat@gmail.com
In reply to: Michael Paquier (#2)
Re: Review of pg_rewind

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com>wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for the feedback. Btw, pg_rewind is not a project included in
Postgres core as a contrib module or anything, so could you send your
feedback and the issues you find directly on github instead? The URL
of the project is https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind.

Sure, I will add those issues on github.

Either way, here are some comments below...

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samrat Revagade
<revagade.samrat@gmail.com> wrote:

While testing pg_rewind I encountered following problem.
I used following process to do the testing, Please correct me if I am

doing

it in wrong way.

Problem-1:
pg_rewind gives error (target master must be shut down cleanly.) when
master crashed unexpectedly.

1. Setup Streaming Replication (stand alone machine : master server port
-5432, standby server port-5433 )
2. Do some operation on master server:
postgres=# create table test(id int);
3. Crash the Postgres process of master:
kill -9 [pid of postgres process of master server]
4. Promote standby server
5. Run pg_rewind:
$ /samrat/postgresql/contrib/pg_rewind/pg_rewind -D
/samrat/master-data/ --source-server='host=localhost port=5433
dbname=postgres' -v
connected to remote server
fetched file "global/pg_control", length 8192
target master must be shut down cleanly.
6. Check masters control information:
$ /samrat/postgresql/install/bin/pg_controldata
/samrat/master-data/ | grep "Database cluster state"
Database cluster state: in production

IIUC It is because pg_rewind does some checks before resynchronizing the
PostgreSQL data directories.
But In real time scenarios, for example due to hardware failure if master
crashed and its controldata shows the state "in production" then

pg_rewind

will fail to pass this check.

Yeah, you could call that a limitation of this module. When I looked
at its code some time ago, I had on top of my mind the addition of an
option of the type --force that could attempt resynchronization of a
master even if it did not shut down correctly.

This sounds good :)

Greetings,
Samrat Revagade