Missing EAI_ADDRFAMILY
BSD/OS 4.3 is missing the define EAI_ADDRFAMILY as referenced in ip.c.
It is marked as obscolete. However, it is still mentioned in the
getaddrinfo() manual page. I have filed a bug report with BSDi.
BSD/OS 4.2 had it defined.
I have added the proper define to our port/bsdi.h, attached.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073Attachments:
/bjm/difftext/plainDownload+5-0
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:12:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
BSD/OS 4.3 is missing the define EAI_ADDRFAMILY as referenced in ip.c.
It is marked as obscolete. However, it is still mentioned in the
getaddrinfo() manual page. I have filed a bug report with BSDi.
There are other more intresting difference between rfc2553,
rfc3493.txt and for instance the SUS specification.
Only rfc2553 has EAI_ADDRFAMILY.
Only rfc2553 has NI_MAXHOST and NI_MAXSERV.
I'm probably forgetting some other things.
Kurt
Oh, so this could come up on other platforms. Interesting. We don't
actually test for the error value, just return it from ip.c from
getaddrinfo() routines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 03:12:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
BSD/OS 4.3 is missing the define EAI_ADDRFAMILY as referenced in ip.c.
It is marked as obscolete. However, it is still mentioned in the
getaddrinfo() manual page. I have filed a bug report with BSDi.There are other more intresting difference between rfc2553,
rfc3493.txt and for instance the SUS specification.Only rfc2553 has EAI_ADDRFAMILY.
Only rfc2553 has NI_MAXHOST and NI_MAXSERV.I'm probably forgetting some other things.
Kurt
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073