OpenORB Re: 2-phase commit

From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:37:53 -0700

Why not apply the effort to something already done and compatibly
licensed?

I'm not sure, what is your point here exactly?

To use OpenORB as as a transaction monitor, you'd still need XA
protocol support (which means 2-phase commit) in each of the
PostgreSQL databases being overseen by that transaction monitor, no?

Or are you saying that OpenORB includes XA support for both the master
and the slave (I am probably using the wrong terminology here), the
code be linked in or otherwise used as-is for PostgreSQL?

Either way, have you actually used OpenORB with a RDBMS, or heard
feedback from anyone else who personally has?

This:
http://dog.intalio.com/ots.html

Appears to be a Berkeley style licensed:
http://dog.intalio.com/license.html

Transaction monitor.

"Overview
The OpenORB Transaction Service is a very scalable transaction monitor
which also provides several extensions like XA management, a management
interface to control all transaction processes and a high reliable
recovery system.

Here is a sourceforge version of the same thing
http://openorb.sourceforge.net/

--
Andrew Piskorski <atp@piskorski.com>
http://www.piskorski.com