SCO embraces MySQL
Ned,
Actually, SCO has supported us for years. They may even have contributed
patches. Their attorneys may be evil incarnate, but their technicians are
friendly and skilled.
I notice the article doesn't mention that the last 6 versions of UnixWare have
included PostgreSQL ...
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Yeah, I know. But I guess there were two things that struck me in the article:
1) No mention of PostgreSQL, as you say
2) The GPL angle (see my other post about NuSphere), and the fact that they chose to distribute the GPL version of MySQL, not strike a corporate deal with MySQL AB
Cheers,
NL
Josh Berkus wrote:
Show quoted text
Ned,
Actually, SCO has supported us for years. They may even have contributed
patches. Their attorneys may be evil incarnate, but their technicians are
friendly and skilled.I notice the article doesn't mention that the last 6 versions of UnixWare have
included PostgreSQL ...
Ned,
1) No mention of PostgreSQL, as you say
According to Stephen, this is because the purpose of the article was to focus
on the irony of SCO using GPL software, after their attacks on the GPL.
We are not GPL.
2) The GPL angle (see my other post about NuSphere), and the fact that they
chose to distribute the GPL version of MySQL, not strike a corporate deal
with MySQL AB
Yeah, interesting. Or, in a word, hypocrisy.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Ned Lilly wrote:
[bcc to hackers, general]
A match made in heaven...
http://news.com.com/2110-7343_3-5236745.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
I don't remember where it was, but there was a really interesting write
up on why mysql seems to be so popular.
Executive Summary:
MySQL is popular on the web because it's more like MSFT Access than many
of the alternatives. Low maintenance, very simple to administrate,
decent for a single user/application.
I have no idea where I'm going with this and don't really plan to, but I
just thought it was interesting.
Ned Lilly wrote:
Yeah, I know. But I guess there were two things that struck me in
the article:1) No mention of PostgreSQL, as you say
2) The GPL angle (see my other post about NuSphere), and the fact
that they chose to distribute the GPL version of MySQL, not strike a
corporate deal with MySQL ABCheers,
NLJosh Berkus wrote:
Ned,
Actually, SCO has supported us for years. They may even have
contributed patches. Their attorneys may be evil incarnate, but
their technicians are friendly and skilled.I notice the article doesn't mention that the last 6 versions of
UnixWare have included PostgreSQL ...---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
your joining column's datatypes do not match
JFYI, 7.4.2 is also now on UnixWare, in addition to whatever's been
On OpenServer.
I pushed for this, and there also will be at least one talk on PostgreSQL
and
Databases for UnixWare/OpenServer at Forum '2004 in Vegas (I'm helping
With this).
Speaking of which, does anyone have a good list of how PG compares with the
Biggies?
Thanks!
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749