New compile warnings in CVS
I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from
pgstat.c:
pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2362: warning: variable `use_mcxt' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2363: warning: variable `mcxt_flags' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
Any ideas on this?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from
pgstat.c:pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2362: warning: variable `use_mcxt' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2363: warning: variable `mcxt_flags' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'Any ideas on this?
Oh this is BSD/OS 4.3 using gcc:
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
I just updated my CVS copy and am seeing four new warnings from
pgstat.c:
pgstat.c:2352: warning: variable `dbentry' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2360: warning: variable `havebackends' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2362: warning: variable `use_mcxt' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
pgstat.c:2363: warning: variable `mcxt_flags' might be clobbered by
`longjmp' or `vfork'
No doubt this is from the PG_TRY that Neil added a couple days ago.
I think he is going to take it out again in favor of using AllocateFile,
so ignore the warnings for now (they're obviously bogus anyway).
regards, tom lane
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 03:57, Tom Lane wrote:
No doubt this is from the PG_TRY that Neil added a couple days ago.
I think he is going to take it out again in favor of using AllocateFile,
so ignore the warnings for now (they're obviously bogus anyway).
Sorry, I didn't see those compile warnings locally (using GCC 3.3).
I'll send the patch for AllocateFile() to -patches shortly.
-Neil