Re: Do you have any objections on contributing your improvements of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
I am very, very sure that anything that makes PostgreSQL stronger will
be deeply appreciated by the PostgreSQL team.
To the PG team, see the following:
http://dbgroup.ncsu.edu/
http://www4.ncsu.edu/~rychirko/
Especially:
http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/selftune/
This is a fabulous project with smashing results, already done against
PostgreSQL.
Could someone on the official PostgreSQL team raise their hand, please,
and say: "We are interested in folding in this valuable research study
back into the core of PostgreSQL, thus making it much stronger and more
capable than it is now."
-----Original Message-----
From: Rada Chirkova [mailto:chirkova@csc.ncsu.edu]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 2:55 PM
To: Rada Chirkova
Cc: Dann Corbit
Subject: Re: Do you have any objections on contributing your
improvements
of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
Dear Dann Corbit, could you tell me whether you have heard back from
PostgreSQL committers on whether they like my enhancements of
PostgreSQL.
Best regards,
Rada
Rada Chirkova wrote:
Thanks! I will work over the summer on getting good students to do
this. Should I get in touch with some PostgreSQL developers other
than
you to coordinate the effort.
Best regards,
Rada
Dann Corbit wrote:
I think that a cooperative effort between the core team of
PostgreSQL
developers and your graduate students is definitely the most
logical
approach.
The PostgreSQL engine has also been updated quite a bit now with
version
8, and so certainly, some changes would be needed.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rada Chirkova [mailto:chirkova@csc.ncsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:53 AM
To: Dann Corbit; Rada Chirkova
Subject: Re: Do you have any objections on contributing yourimprovements
of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
Dear Dann Corbit,
thanks for your response. I would be really delighted to
contribute to
the PostgreSQL core. At the same time, I have doubts about the
quality
of the implementation by my students. Do you think it would make
sense
to have good students reimplement the functionalities, perhaps
with
some
guidance from regular PostgreSQL contributors?
Best regards,
Rada
Dann Corbit wrote:
My name is Dann Corbit. I work for a company called CONNX
Solutions
Inc. (which is a database company -- we write middleware like
ODBC/OLEDB/JDBC/.NET drivers and things of that nature).
Here is our web site:
http://www.connx.com/We also happen to use PostgreSQL in some of our projects, and I
have
had
some minor involvement in the PostgreSQL projects. For instance,
the
PostgreSQL team used some code we wrote in creating a native
version
of
PostgreSQL 7.1.3 for creating the native windows version of
PostgreSQL
8.0.
I read your paper on the network and downloaded the source code
that
you
created. It looks like a great enhancement to the PostgreSQL
database
system. For that reason, I was wondering if you would object to
posting
your changes back into the PostgreSQL 8 core so that the new
functionality is available to everyone.If you go and look on the PostgreSQL list server, you will see
that I
post there fairly often.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rada Chirkova [mailto:chirkova@csc.ncsu.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 4:10 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Subject: Re: Do you have any objections on contributing yourimprovements
of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?
Hi,
could you tell me about yourself - your message was kind of
brief ;)
Show quoted text
Best regards,
Rada
Dann Corbit wrote:
It seems to me that your enhancements are extremely useful.
Dann,
Could someone on the official PostgreSQL team raise their hand, please,
and say: "We are interested in folding in this valuable research study
back into the core of PostgreSQL, thus making it much stronger and more
capable than it is now."
As much as I would love to do just that, you know that's not the way it works.
All patches ... including mine, Bruce's, Jan's, and even sometimes Tom's,
have to be evaluated for usefulness, clean code, bugs, etc.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
What Rada Chirkova is looking for is an endorsement of the project.
The work has already been completed and studied in detail but on PG
7.3.4 rather than using the current code base.
The plan is to redo it with grad students and careful supervision to
ensure the highest quality.
She wants to know if the PG group would want this work to be done.
I am sure that she expects code reviews and beta tests and all the other
standard fare.
-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com]
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 4:03 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Do you have any objections on contributing your
improvements of the PostgreSQL core back into the product?Dann,
Could someone on the official PostgreSQL team raise their hand,
please,
and say: "We are interested in folding in this valuable research
study
back into the core of PostgreSQL, thus making it much stronger and
more
capable than it is now."
As much as I would love to do just that, you know that's not the way
it
works.
All patches ... including mine, Bruce's, Jan's, and even sometimes
Tom's,
Show quoted text
have to be evaluated for usefulness, clean code, bugs, etc.
--
--JoshJosh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
Import Notes
Resolved by subject fallback
Dann,
What Rada Chirkova is looking for is an endorsement of the project.
Well, let me read up on the research -- it's more than a little unclear just
from the abstract what the code is supposed to accomplish. You just posted
it a few days ago, and I really haven't had time to follow up. We may very
well want it for Bizgres as well.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco