psql and ROLES

Started by Stefan Kaltenbrunnerover 20 years ago3 messages
#1Stefan Kaltenbrunner
stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc

Hi,

I'm currently working on syncing psql's tab-complete code with the docs
especially wrt ROLES. while working on this I noticed the following things:

*) there is no backslash command for getting a list of Roles (like \du &
\dg for Users and Groups) - I'm considering using \dr for that - does
that sound sensible ?

*) the new connectionlimit code allows for negative Limits (beside -1)
like this:

playground=# CREATE ROLE testrole LOGIN CONNECTION LIMIT -999999999;
CREATE ROLE

that doesn't strike me as that useful (and it is not clear what that
should mean anyway because such a user can still login) - so maybe we
should reject that (and create a sensible upper bound for that too)

Stefan

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Stefan Kaltenbrunner (#1)
Re: psql and ROLES

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:

*) there is no backslash command for getting a list of Roles (like \du &
\dg for Users and Groups) - I'm considering using \dr for that - does
that sound sensible ?

We could just recycle \du and/or \dg for the purpose. If those should
still exist as separate commands, what should they do differently from
\dr? There's no longer any hard-and-fast distinction ...

*) the new connectionlimit code allows for negative Limits (beside -1)

Right now, any negative value is interpreted as "no limit". I don't
feel a pressing need to change that.

regards, tom lane

#3Stefan Kaltenbrunner
stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: psql and ROLES

Tom Lane wrote:

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:

*) there is no backslash command for getting a list of Roles (like \du &
\dg for Users and Groups) - I'm considering using \dr for that - does
that sound sensible ?

We could just recycle \du and/or \dg for the purpose. If those should
still exist as separate commands, what should they do differently from
\dr? There's no longer any hard-and-fast distinction ...

ok - that seems sensible - I will just reuse \du for this

*) the new connectionlimit code allows for negative Limits (beside -1)

Right now, any negative value is interpreted as "no limit". I don't
feel a pressing need to change that.

ok - in that case we might consider changing the wording in the docs
from "-1 (the default) means no limit" to something like "any negative
value means no limit"

Stefan