Timezone List

On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:07:58AM +1000, Naz Gassiep wrote:

Any chance for a DB Client accessible list of allowable time zones? I've
been told that the only way to get at this list is by looking through
the source and lifting the list from zone.tab.

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html

While I'm at it, how about an accessible list of country codes? I know
that it's not core db functionality, but these lists are so universally
useful that making users parse the files and store them in tables seems
silly.

Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a
project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets.

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html

Great, thanks for that

Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a
project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets.

Currently, it is stored in /src/timezone/data/iso3166.tab and I propose
to have it available in a system view or something similar. This data is
as useful as the available timezones, although I concede that it is not
part of PG functionality and this may be more appropriate as a simple
file that can be psql -f'd into the database if users need it as part of
an app. It's more "developer helper data" than "database functionlity"
and hence it could be more appropriate to distribute through the support
community rather than as part of the postgresql core.

Comments?

Naz Gassiep <naz@mira.net> writes:

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:

Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a
project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets.

Currently, it is stored in /src/timezone/data/iso3166.tab and I propose
to have it available in a system view or something similar.

Hm. I wasn't aware that that was present in the zic database; it's not
something used by or even exposed to the rest of the system. I would
not support adding code that depends on it being there.

regards, tom lane

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not
the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes
me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code
similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output.

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
the other view.

regards, tom lane

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not
the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes
me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code
similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output.

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
the other view.

regards, tom lane

I agree with having two views, and I also think that the name as it is,
is not right. I agree with pg_timezone_abbrevs and pg_timezone_names or
similar.

On a related note, there is not a one:one relationship between
abbreviations and zone names, some abbreviations are used by two zones
(forex "EST", "CST" and others are used in Australia and the Americas)
and currently it is a server configuration directive
(australian_timezones) to assume Australian or American zones in the
case of ambiguity.

I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing
seems like an ugly hackaround to me. I do not have a proposed solution
to this, but I see a non-trivial risk of an application being
re-deployed on a server where the admin forgets to change this directive
resulting in all kinds of fun and games. Forgive me if this is an
already-discussed issue.

I am also rather baffled at the way "SAT" is changed from being
interpreted as a day of the week in one mode, and a timezone in another.
This seems an awful incongruity of behavior, and "SAT" should be
interpreted as a timezone in both modes. If it must be done, switching
of this behavior doesn't fit in with the purpose of the
australian_timezones directive and should be made the subject of a
different directive (e.g., sat_is_timezone(boolean) or something
similar). SAT should, IMHO, always be considered a timezone and use of
the "SAT" string by DB programmers should be just another case for care
as with any other SQL keyword.

Naz Gassiep <naz@mira.net> writes:

I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing
seems like an ugly hackaround to me.

You really shouldn't be pontificating about this if you haven't been
paying attention to recent development work ;-)

regards, tom lane

I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing
seems like an ugly hackaround to me.

You really shouldn't be pontificating about this if you haven't been
paying attention to recent development work ;-)

regards, tom lane

Aah, sorry, I don't watch dev progress very closely. This is something
that has been bugging me since 7.4.x branch and I never got around to
whining about it. Consider my comments retracted.

- Naz

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:

http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.

html

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset
abbreviations, not the full zone names that you could use
with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes me that we should have a view
for that as well. We could use code similar to
scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output.

You know, I think I suggested that back in the days when I worked on the
replacement timezone code, and you didn't want it back then ;-) If you
think it's good now then yes, I still think it is. I may even have the
code for it around somewhere if I go look a bit...

Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze, want me
to look for it?

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because
pg_timezonenames is sitting on the obvious name for such a
view, and once we release 8.2 we won't be able to change it.
On reflection I think the existing view is wrongly named ---
perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or more readably,
perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for the
other view.

Seems reasonable - my vote is for the more readable version.

//Magnus

On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:29:04AM +1000, Naz Gassiep wrote:

I am also rather baffled at the way "SAT" is changed from being
interpreted as a day of the week in one mode, and a timezone in another.

Ugh. It'd be an argument if people actually used SAT as a timezone.
They don't, it's ACST.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:

Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze, want me
to look for it?

Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will probably
help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.

regards, tom lane

On 2006-09-06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not
the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes
me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code
similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output.

Any view over the full timezone names should also include the corresponding
data from zone.tab in the timezone library source.

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
the other view.

Yes, the abbreviations table is definitely misnamed.

--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not
the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes
me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code
similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output.

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
the other view.

I think 'abbrev' is a like unintuitive. How about 'short_names'?

Gavin

Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze,

want me

to look for it?

Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will
probably help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.

Here goes. Tested only on win32 so far, but works there. No docs yet
either - need to know if it goes in first ;)

It only returns the name, but if you want more funky stuff you can do
things like

select name,current_timestamp at time zone name from pg_timezone_names

//Magnus

Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze,

want me

to look for it?

Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will

probably

help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.

Here goes. Tested only on win32 so far, but works there. No docs
yet either - need to know if it goes in first ;)

It only returns the name, but if you want more funky stuff you can
do things like

select name,current_timestamp at time zone name from
pg_timezone_names

Oh, and it's going to need an update to expected/rules.out, not included
in the patch, as well.

//Magnus

In the CVS version there is a table with this information:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-

timezonenames

.html

Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset

abbreviations,

not the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE.

It

strikes me that we should have a view for that as well. We could

use

code similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view

output.

Any view over the full timezone names should also include the
corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source.

Just noticed this mail, so that's not included in my patch. But couldn't
we just load that file up in a separate table if needed, and then join
with it when necessary?

//Magnus

Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:

It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
the other view.

I think 'abbrev' is a like unintuitive. How about 'short_names'?

I'm not wedded to "abbrevs", but I don't like "short_names" because it
suggests that the names in the one view are just shorter forms of the
names in the other view, whereas really they aren't comparable things
at all (eg, EDT and EST5EDT are very different animals, because the
latter includes a set of DST transition-date rules).

I suppose the same argument could be made against "abbrevs" of course,
but it seems stronger if we have "names" and "short_names".

regards, tom lane

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:

Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze,
want me to look for it?

Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will
probably help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.

Here goes. Tested only on win32 so far, but works there. No docs yet
either - need to know if it goes in first ;)

I've applied this along with some extra work to get it to show GMT
offsets and DST status, which should be useful for helping people
to choose which setting they want. This effectively obsoletes
Table B-5 as well as B-4 in the SGML docs ... we should probably
remove both of those in favor of recommending people look at the
views.

I did the basic documentation work in catalogs.sgml for these views,
but Appendix B still needs an update. Joachim, you were going to do
that, right?

regards, tom lane

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:

Any view over the full timezone names should also include the
corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source.

Just noticed this mail, so that's not included in my patch.

BTW, now that the view is in, I can't help noticing that it shows 550
different zone names, while there are only 392 entries in the zone.tab
file. I conclude that the zic people don't take maintenance of zone.tab
very seriously, and hence that we probably shouldn't rely on it.

regards, tom lane

On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:19:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

I've applied this along with some extra work to get it to show GMT
offsets and DST status, which should be useful for helping people
to choose which setting they want. This effectively obsoletes
Table B-5 as well as B-4 in the SGML docs ... we should probably
remove both of those in favor of recommending people look at the
views.

I did the basic documentation work in catalogs.sgml for these views,
but Appendix B still needs an update. Joachim, you were going to do
that, right?

Thats right.

Joachim

--
Joachim Wieland joe@mcknight.de
GPG key available