PthreadGC2 of MinGW is not linked.

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:06:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Hi Magnus.

configure was changed the cvs head.
Is this what you intended it?_?

I think necessary to recover it.

*** configure.orig      Tue Apr  3 17:51:06 2007
--- configure   Tue Apr  3 17:52:21 2007
***************
*** 16732,16739 ****
# For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
# libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
# See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! # WIN32 doesn't need the pthread tests;  it always uses threads
! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes -a "$PORTNAME" != "win32"; then

--- 16732,16738 ----
# For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
# libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
# See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes; then

Am I misunderstanding it?

That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.

Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

//Magnus

Hi.

Am I misunderstanding it?

That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.

Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?
Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
I was too busy and did not catch up with you....
I start the work at once. Thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Hi.

Am I misunderstanding it?

That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.

Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?

Not any more.

Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.

Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

//Magnus

Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.

Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

And to port the build system to msbuild...

:-)

/D

From: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>

Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:

Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.

Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

And to port the build system to msbuild...

:-)

Ugaa, Probably, I expected for fear of it. :-)
Furthermore, PostGIS is required. For the time being, it is necessary
to fight with the nightmare. I was able to give good environment.
It will be desired. surely :-)

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito