pgsql: The E.

Started by Nonameabout 18 years ago4 messages
#1Noname
tgl@postgresql.org

Log Message:
-----------
The E. J. Pratt verse used as a tsearch test case is unfortunately still
under copyright in the US and many other places. Substitute a little
something from a poet who's more safely dead. Per gripe from Bjorn Munch.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/test/regress/expected:
tsearch.out (r1.10 -> r1.11)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/tsearch.out?r1=1.10&r2=1.11)
pgsql/src/test/regress/sql:
tsearch.sql (r1.5 -> r1.6)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/sql/tsearch.sql?r1=1.5&r2=1.6)

#2Simon Riggs
simon@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Noname (#1)
Re: pgsql: The E.

On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 21:01 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:

Log Message:
-----------
The E. J. Pratt verse used as a tsearch test case is unfortunately still
under copyright in the US and many other places. Substitute a little
something from a poet who's more safely dead. Per gripe from Bjorn Munch.

The very deep did rot : O Christ !
That ever this should be !

Don't want to shoot your Albatross, but those lines were written by
Coleridge. Must give the appropriate credits :-)

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Simon Riggs (#2)
Re: pgsql: The E.

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Don't want to shoot your Albatross, but those lines were written by
Coleridge. Must give the appropriate credits :-)

Doh ... of course ... but why does Project Gutenberg have it filed
under Wordsworth?

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/8905

Anyway, you are certainly correct; will go fix the attribution.

regards, tom lane

#4Gregory Stark
stark@enterprisedb.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: pgsql: The E.

"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Don't want to shoot your Albatross, but those lines were written by
Coleridge. Must give the appropriate credits :-)

Doh ... of course ... but why does Project Gutenberg have it filed
under Wordsworth?

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/8905

Anyway, you are certainly correct; will go fix the attribution.

oh phooey, this spoils what I was going to post.

Worsworth would have proven a particularly ironic choice. He fought long and
hard to extend copyright terms.

http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0030-8129%28196109%2976%3A4%3C380%3AWATCAO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P&amp;size=LARGE&amp;origin=JSTOR-enlargePage

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!