New pg_dump patch -- document statistics collector exception
This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
environment variable supported by libpq.
It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.
This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.
Attachments:
pgdump_man.patchtext/x-diff; name=pgdump_man.patchDownload+12-1
On Tuesday 20 January 2009 20:22:10 Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
environment variable supported by libpq.It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.
This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.
s/varriable/variable/g
also, I forget which way is proper, but you're inconsistent with your closing
tags for <application> in that paragraph (using both </application and </>)
--
Robert Treat
Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net
Consulting: http://www.omniti.com
Robert Treat wrote:
also, I forget which way is proper, but you're inconsistent with your closing
tags for <application> in that paragraph (using both </application and </>)
They're both acceptable.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
-Bryce
Attachments:
pgsl_doc_src_sgml.patchtext/x-diff; name=pgsl_doc_src_sgml.patchDownload+14-1
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
-Bryce
You already have.
Mind you, in the future when you're not continuing a discussion from a
code patch, you should submit doc patches to pgsql-docs. But I'm sure
Peter has seen it here.
--Josh
Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?
Added to next commit fest [1]http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2009-First.
[1]: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest_2009-First
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?Added to next commit fest [1].
Um, not necessary. We're still accepting new doc patches, and will
until the end of beta.
--Josh
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
This is a proposed patch to document disabling the statistics collector
pg_dump activity, and give a bit more visibility to the PGOPTIONS
environment variable supported by libpq.It is an alternative to the prior patch, which supplied a --no-stats flag.
This is a documentation only patch, not tied to a recent code change.
Patch applied, with spelling correction already noted.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Josh Berkus wrote:
Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
Bryce Nesbitt escreveu:
Here's a revision (thanks Robert Treat for the spelling corrextion).
If there are no other objections, how do I nominate it for consideration?Added to next commit fest [1].
Um, not necessary. We're still accepting new doc patches, and will
until the end of beta.
Yep, patch commited, removed from next commit fest.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachments:
pg_dump.patchtext/x-diff; name=pg_dump.patchDownload+14-0
Apologies. Turns out the name of the relevant setting was changed
for 8.3! So a revised patch is attached.
For backing, see:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html
" Numerous changes in administrative server parameters...
stats_block_level and stats_row_level are merged into track_counts."
Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
We don't want a pg_dump flag; the doc mention is good enough.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachments:
pg_doc_patch.patchtext/x-diff; name=pg_doc_patch.patchDownload+12-12
We don't want a pg_dump flag; the doc mention is good enough.
Doh! Try this one instead. Postgres 8.3 changed the name of the
flag mentioned in the doc.
[ Please avoid html-only email.]
OK, patch applied, but I removed the mention of pre-8.3 because this is
going only in the 8.4 docs.
Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +