Patch for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2
Hi,
PFA patch, readme for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2 and
testcases.
The patch automates table partitioning to support Range and Hash partitions.
Please refer to attached readme file for further details.
The syntax used conforms to most of the suggestions mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00413.php, barring
the following:
-- Specification of partition names is optional. System will be able to
generate partition names in such cases.
-- Sub partitioning
Regards,
--
Kedar.
Attachments:
Kedar,
Added to first CommitFest of 8.5. Thanks for the nice test case.
Folks who are not busy with 8.4 are urged to test this as soon as you can.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
Import Notes
Reply to msg id not found: 4A2D47E3.2060708@agliodbs.com
make -C catalog all
( echo src/backend/catalog/catalog.o src/backend/catalog/dependency.o
src/backend/catalog/heap.o src/backend/catalog/index.o src/backend/
catalog/indexing.o src/backend/catalog/namespace.o src/backend/catalog/
aclchk.o src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.o src/backend/catalog/
pg_constraint.o src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.o src/backend/
catalog/pg_depend.o src/backend/catalog/pg_enum.o src/backend/catalog/
pg_inherits.o src/backend/catalog/pg_largeobject.o src/backend/catalog/
pg_namespace.o src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.o src/backend/catalog/
pg_proc.o src/backend/catalog/pg_shdepend.o src/backend/catalog/
pg_type.o src/backend/catalog/storage.o src/backend/catalog/
toasting.o ) >objfiles.txt
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../../src/include/catalog/
pg_partition.h', needed by `postgres.bki'. Stop.
make[2]: *** [catalog-recursive] Error 2
(that's on mac os x).
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl> wrote:
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../../../src/include/catalog/pg_partition.h', needed by `postgres.bki'. Stop.
there is no pg_partition.h file in the patch, please send it
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
PFA the required header file.
Regards,
--
Kedar.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jaime Casanova <
jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
Show quoted text
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>
wrote:make[3]: *** No rule to make target
`../../../src/include/catalog/pg_partition.h', needed by `postgres.bki'.
Stop.there is no pg_partition.h file in the patch, please send it
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
Attachments:
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -
Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -
fwrapv -bundle -multiply_defined suppress regress.o -
bundle_loader ../../../src/backend/postgres -L../../../src/port -o
regress.so
cp ../../../contrib/spi/refint.so refint.so
cp ../../../contrib/spi/autoinc.so autoinc.so
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -
Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -
fwrapv pg_regress.o pg_regress_main.o -L../../../src/port -Wl,-
dead_strip_dylibs -lpgport -lz -lreadline -lm -o pg_regress
make -C config all
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
/bin/sh: /Users/gj/Projects/postgres-head/pgsql/partition.sh: No such
file or directory
make: *** [all] Error 127
PFA. This file is to be kept in 'pgsql_init' base directory.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <gj@pointblue.com.pl>wrote:
Show quoted text
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
-bundle -multiply_defined suppress regress.o -bundle_loader
../../../src/backend/postgres -L../../../src/port -o regress.so
cp ../../../contrib/spi/refint.so refint.so
cp ../../../contrib/spi/autoinc.so autoinc.so
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv
pg_regress.o pg_regress_main.o -L../../../src/port -Wl,-dead_strip_dylibs
-lpgport -lz -lreadline -lm -o pg_regress
make -C config all
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'./bin/sh: /Users/gj/Projects/postgres-head/pgsql/partition.sh: No such file
or directorymake: *** [all] Error 127
Attachments:
Hi,
The patch automates table partitioning to support Range and Hash
partitions. Please refer to attached readme file for further details.The syntax used conforms to most of the suggestions mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00413.php, barring
the following:
-- Specification of partition names is optional. System will be able to
generate partition names in such cases.
-- Sub partitioning
Some comments based on a brief glance of the patch:
- The logic to execute the partition triggers last still needs some more
work IMHO. Relying on just the names might not get accepted. I think you
should pay attention to Andrew Dunstan's suggestion in an earlier mail to
have tgkind enumerations to generalize the same or discuss it further.
"the scheme should turn tgisconstraint into a multi-valued item (tgkind: 'u'
= userland, 'c'= constraint, 'p' = partition or some such)."
- Similarly, assigning "of_relname_oid" names to overflow tables also might
not work. The best way ahead could be to invent a new relkind
RELKIND_OVERFLOW to handle it. Or maybe we can have a new schema pg_overflow
to store the overflow relation with the same name (suffixed with _overflow
to make it clearer) as the parent relation too. The relkind solution might
be cleaner though. This might need further discussion. In general, it is
definitely not a bad idea to discuss such sub-problems on the list :)
- Am I reading the patch correctly that you do not end up creating indexes
on the children tables? That is a big problem!
- You can remove the remnants of the first patch like the MutateColumnRefs()
function, for example (I agree this is WIP, but unwanted/unused functions
unnecessarily add to the size). With large patches, the more precise the
patch, the better it will be for reviewers/readers.
Great work all in all!
Regards,
Nikhils
--
http://www.enterprisedb.com
still doesn't work:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/config'
/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 14: a.keyorder,:
command not found
/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 15: where: command not
found
: command not foundcts/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 16:
Please make sure you test patches before sending here, on clean checkout!.
I did a fresh checkout and applied patch and added files and it works at my
end.
Is there any problem with formatting of the file? May be some
characters('\') missing in conversion?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 4:14 PM, gj <gj@pointblue.com.pl> wrote:
Show quoted text
still doesn't work:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/config'
/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 14: a.keyorder,:
command not found
/home/gjaskie/Projects/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 15: where: command
not
found
: command not foundcts/postgres/pgsql/partition.sh: line 16:Please make sure you test patches before sending here, on clean checkout!.
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 at 13:52:08, Kedar Potdar wrote:
I did a fresh checkout and applied patch and added files and it works at my
end.Is there any problem with formatting of the file? May be some
characters('\') missing in conversion?
For one, I think you should put it around in quotes, when you echo something out
- just in case.
Second, isn't there any better way to do it, than in shell script ?
Shouldn't that bit be called on make check, not on build (make).?
Hi Nikhil,
I am sorry for the late reply. :(
Please find inline my comments.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Nikhil Sontakke <
nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi,
The patch automates table partitioning to support Range and Hash
partitions. Please refer to attached readme file for further details.The syntax used conforms to most of the suggestions mentioned in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-01/msg00413.php,
barring the following:
-- Specification of partition names is optional. System will be able to
generate partition names in such cases.
-- Sub partitioningSome comments based on a brief glance of the patch:
- The logic to execute the partition triggers last still needs some more
work IMHO. Relying on just the names might not get accepted. I think you
should pay attention to Andrew Dunstan's suggestion in an earlier mail to
have tgkind enumerations to generalize the same or discuss it further."the scheme should turn tgisconstraint into a multi-valued item (tgkind:
'u' = userland, 'c'= constraint, 'p' = partition or some such)."
Kedar >> I am working on to turn tgisconstraint into a multi-values item to
categorize user, constraint and partition triggers. In doing so, I am
thinking of adding adding 'PARTITION' keyword to existing syntax to create
partition triggers i.e. CREATE PARTITION TRIGGER ... The partition triggers
would now be identified with the type rather than naming scheme though
naming scheme for partition triggers would still be there.
- Similarly, assigning "of_relname_oid" names to overflow tables also might
not work. The best way ahead could be to invent a new relkind
RELKIND_OVERFLOW to handle it. Or maybe we can have a new schema pg_overflow
to store the overflow relation with the same name (suffixed with _overflow
to make it clearer) as the parent relation too. The relkind solution might
be cleaner though. This might need further discussion. In general, it is
definitely not a bad idea to discuss such sub-problems on the list :)
Kedar >> I will look at it once done with catagorizing partition triggers. I
am inclined toward using a new relkind like RELKIND_OVERFLOW.
- Am I reading the patch correctly that you do not end up creating indexes
on the children tables? That is a big problem!
Kedar >> As Srinath K is working on global indexes, the merge of
partitioning and global indexes should be able to extend indexes created on
partitioned table to children as well.
- You can remove the remnants of the first patch like the
MutateColumnRefs() function, for example (I agree this is WIP, but
unwanted/unused functions unnecessarily add to the size). With large
patches, the more precise the patch, the better it will be for
reviewers/readers.
Kedar >> Yeah.
Great work all in all!
Kedar >> Thanks! Looking forward to your continued co-operation.
Show quoted text
Regards,
Nikhils
--
http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Kedar Potdar<kedar.potdar@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
PFA patch, readme for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2 and
testcases.
if you are still working on this, can you please update the patch to cvs head?
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
Yes. I am working to integrate some of the comments received for the patch.
I would be able to post latest patch in the next week.
Regards,
--
Kedar.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Jaime Casanova <
jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Kedar Potdar<kedar.potdar@gmail.com>
wrote:Hi,
PFA patch, readme for automating partitions in PostgreSQL 8.4 Beta 2 and
testcases.if you are still working on this, can you please update the patch to cvs
head?--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
--
Regards,
--
Kedar.
Read 'me' - http://kpotdar.livejournal.com
Anyone knows what's the latest on that patch ?
To be honest, this was the thing that I was looking forward most in
8.5 ... (and probably not only me alone).
Grzegorz Jaskiewicz wrote:
Anyone knows what's the latest on that patch ?
To be honest, this was the thing that I was looking forward most in
8.5 ... (and probably not only me alone).
We are also interested in integrating our autopartitioning patch for
COPY with that implementation. I can help with the partitioning
implementation and/or testing of that feature since this is of interest
for Aster too.
Emmanuel
--
Emmanuel Cecchet
Aster Data Systems
Web: http://www.asterdata.com