regression test HAVING fixed

Started by Bruce Momjianalmost 27 years ago3 messages

maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

almost 27 years ago

I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work
now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Tom Lane

tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

almost 27 years ago

In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#1)

Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work
now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union"
test is still failing by adding a bunch of

NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal

lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that?

regards, tom lane

Import Notes

Reply to msg id not found: YourmessageofWed27Jan1999105212-0500199901271552.KAA08284@candle.pha.pa.us | Resolved by subject fallback

Vadim Mikheev

vadim@krs.ru

almost 27 years ago

In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)

Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed

Tom Lane wrote:

Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:

I have fixed the problem I introduced with aggregates. They should work
now, and the HAVING regression test should work too.

Also, I put in Vadim's recommended fix for the subplan problem.
The regression tests look a lot better than they did. The "union"
test is still failing by adding a bunch of

NOTICE: equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal

lines to the expected output. Anybody know what's causing that?

Type 600 is Query node. Attempt to compare Queries?
Try gdb with break point @ equalfuncs.c:746...

Vadim