reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
Attachments:
numeric_2b-v2.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=numeric_2b-v2.patchDownload+191-65
On 31 July 2010 07:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.(There is still a small, side issue with numeric_maximum_size() which
I plan to fix, but this patch is the good stuff.)
Applies fine, compiles fine, passes regression tests, and demonstrates
the same space reduction seen with the previous version of the patch.
Marking Ready for Committer.
Cheers,
BJ
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.
This version looks fine to me.
regards, tom lane
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
Here's a second version of the main patch, in which I have attempted
to respond to Tom's concerns/suggestions.This version looks fine to me.
Excellent. Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company