fixed doc bug in sepgsql.sgml

Started by Susanne Ebrechtalmost 15 years ago2 messages

Susanne Ebrecht

susanne@2ndQuadrant.com

almost 15 years ago

1 attachment(s)

Hello,

by accident we recognised that the author of sepgsql.sgml
used < and > instead of < and >

I just fixed it and here is the patch.

Susanne

--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
www.2ndQuadrant.com

Attachments:

doc_sepgsql.patchtext/x-patch; name=doc_sepgsql.patchDownload

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/sepgsql.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/sepgsql.sgml
index 21b46de..589fe79 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/sepgsql.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/sepgsql.sgml
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ $ initdb
 $ vi $PGDATA/postgresql.conf
 $ for DBNAME in template0 template1 postgres; do
   postgres --single -F -O -c exit_on_error=true $DBNAME \
-      < /usr/local/pgsql/share/contrib/sepgsql.sql > /dev/null
+      &lt; /usr/local/pgsql/share/contrib/sepgsql.sql &gt; /dev/null
   done
 </screen>

Heikki Linnakangas

heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com

almost 15 years ago

In reply to: Susanne Ebrecht (#1)

Re: fixed doc bug in sepgsql.sgml

On 02.04.2011 10:24, Susanne Ebrecht wrote:

Hello,

by accident we recognised that the author of sepgsql.sgml
used < and > instead of < and >

I just fixed it and here is the patch.

Committed, and I also fixed one case of that in pg_basebackup docs.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com