gcc 4.6 -Wunused-but-set-variable

Started by Peter Eisentrautalmost 15 years ago3 messageshackers
Jump to latest
#1Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net

Another set of new gcc 4.6 warnings:

readfuncs.c: In function ‘_readCaseWhen’:
readfuncs.c:875:567: warning: variable ‘token’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
readfuncs.c: In function ‘_readFromExpr’:
readfuncs.c:1159:568: warning: variable ‘token’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

read.c: In function ‘nodeTokenType’:
read.c:222:8: warning: variable ‘val’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]

I couldn't see a way good way of programming around this (perhaps in the
second case, but it would get uselessly ugly), so perhaps just marking
the variables as potentially unused would be appropriate? See patch.

Attachments:

gcc-4.6-attribute-unused.patchtext/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name=gcc-4.6-attribute-unused.patchDownload+2-2
#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#1)
Re: gcc 4.6 -Wunused-but-set-variable

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

I couldn't see a way good way of programming around this (perhaps in the
second case, but it would get uselessly ugly), so perhaps just marking
the variables as potentially unused would be appropriate? See patch.

Of course this would break not only on non-gcc compilers, but old
versions of gcc. I'd suggest a macro (cf PERL_UNUSED_DECL) and some
version checks at the site of the macro declaration (perhaps the ones
emitted by bison for its use of this construct will do).

regards, tom lane

#3Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)
Re: gcc 4.6 -Wunused-but-set-variable

On ons, 2011-06-15 at 19:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

I couldn't see a way good way of programming around this (perhaps in the
second case, but it would get uselessly ugly), so perhaps just marking
the variables as potentially unused would be appropriate? See patch.

Of course this would break not only on non-gcc compilers, but old
versions of gcc. I'd suggest a macro (cf PERL_UNUSED_DECL) and some
version checks at the site of the macro declaration (perhaps the ones
emitted by bison for its use of this construct will do).

Non-GCC compilers would be fine, because we define away __attribute__
there anyway, but on GCC itself, you're right, the "unused" attribute is
a bit more recent than ancient.

Actually, casting to void, which is the convention we already use
elsewhere, works for this, so done that way.