Small 9.1 documentation fix (SSPI auth)
When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we
forgot to fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I
also put that four-liner into any CFs?
--
Christian
Attachments:
sspi-doc.patchtext/plain; name=sspi-doc.patch; x-mac-creator=0; x-mac-type=0Download
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 575eb3b..e7c7db4
*** a/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/client-auth.sgml
*************** omicron bryanh
*** 989,996 ****
<literal>negotiate</literal> mode, which will use
<productname>Kerberos</productname> when possible and automatically
fall back to <productname>NTLM</productname> in other cases.
! <productname>SSPI</productname> authentication only works when both
! server and client are running <productname>Windows</productname>.
</para>
<para>
--- 989,998 ----
<literal>negotiate</literal> mode, which will use
<productname>Kerberos</productname> when possible and automatically
fall back to <productname>NTLM</productname> in other cases.
! In addition to clients running on <productname>Windows</productname>,
! <productname>SSPI</productname> authentication is also supported by
! <application>libpq</application>-based clients on other platforms,
! through the use of <productname>GSSAPI</productname>.
</para>
<para>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net> wrote:
When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to
fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that
four-liner into any CFs?
I have committed a slightly different wording change to fix this
problem. Let me know whether it looks OK...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
* Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Christian Ullrich<chris@chrullrich.net> wrote:
When Magnus fixed and applied my SSPI-via-GSS patch in January, we forgot to
fix to the documentation. Suggested patch attached; should I also put that
four-liner into any CFs?
I have committed a slightly different wording change to fix this
problem. Let me know whether it looks OK...
It does. Thanks for fixing.
--
Christian