unknown symbol 'lo_unlink'
Subject changed.
Hey folks, still looking for a little help on this. I can insert data
and (obviously create tables). Further, I've discovered PHP with pg
support yields an unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' when Apache tries to load
it. Any help/pointers would be really appreciated.
What kind of version of apache/PHP/PostgreSQL are you using? Do you
use DSO? What was the exact error message when you found lo_unlink was
an unknown symbol? What kind of platform are you running?
I myself have been using apache 1.3.6(DSO)/PHP 3.0.7/PostgreSQL 6.4.2
or current on x86 Linux/LinuxPPC/mips Linux/FreeBSD for a while but
have never seen problems you mentioned.
---
Tatsuo Ishii
Import Notes
Reply to msg id not found: YourmessageofSat24Apr1999222858GMT.372245A9.EEAC8891@arcavia.com
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
Subject changed.
Hey folks, still looking for a little help on this. I can insert data
and (obviously create tables). Further, I've discovered PHP with pg
support yields an unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' when Apache tries to load
it. Any help/pointers would be really appreciated.What kind of version of apache/PHP/PostgreSQL are you using? Do you
use DSO? What was the exact error message when you found lo_unlink was
an unknown symbol? What kind of platform are you running?I myself have been using apache 1.3.6(DSO)/PHP 3.0.7/PostgreSQL 6.4.2
or current on x86 Linux/LinuxPPC/mips Linux/FreeBSD for a while but
have never seen problems you mentioned.
Thanks for your reply. I'm using apache 1.3.6 (DSO), PHP 3.0.6 and PG
6.4.2. I was able to successfully run apache/php/pg under LinuxPPC R4 and
haven't had any probs under i386 Linux distros, however I have tried the
YDL and R5 rpms (as well as compiling from tarballs) and run in to this
error every time on YDL. I think its related to the other problems but I'm
not sure. The error message is "Unknown symbol lo_unlink". It might be
helpful if you let me know the options you pass to the configure script,
then I could try with those options.
TIA
-JP
Hey folks, still looking for a little help on this. I can insert data
and (obviously create tables). Further, I've discovered PHP with pg
support yields an unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' when Apache tries to load
it. Any help/pointers would be really appreciated.What kind of version of apache/PHP/PostgreSQL are you using? Do you
use DSO? What was the exact error message when you found lo_unlink was
an unknown symbol? What kind of platform are you running?I myself have been using apache 1.3.6(DSO)/PHP 3.0.7/PostgreSQL 6.4.2
or current on x86 Linux/LinuxPPC/mips Linux/FreeBSD for a while but
have never seen problems you mentioned.Thanks for your reply. I'm using apache 1.3.6 (DSO), PHP 3.0.6 and PG
6.4.2. I was able to successfully run apache/php/pg under LinuxPPC R4 and
haven't had any probs under i386 Linux distros, however I have tried the
YDL and R5 rpms (as well as compiling from tarballs) and run in to this
error every time on YDL. I think its related to the other problems but I'mnot sure. The error message is "Unknown symbol lo_unlink". It might be
helpful if you let me know the options you pass to the configure script,
then I could try with those options.
PostgreSQL: configure --with-mb=EUC_JP
Apache: OPTIM="-O2" /configure --enable-module=so
php: configure --with-pgsql --with-apache=../apache_1.3.6 --enable-track-vars --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
I also use LinuxPPC R4. So I guess there's something special with YDL
and R5, not with your builds. (BTW, what is YDL?) I'm going to try R5
after official R5 is released.
---
Tatsuo Ishii
Import Notes
Reply to msg id not found: YourmessageofTue27Apr1999132919GMT.3725BBAF.2812D80F@arcavia.com | Resolved by subject fallback
At 18:02 +0300 on 27/04/1999, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
I also use LinuxPPC R4. So I guess there's something special with YDL
and R5, not with your builds. (BTW, what is YDL?) I'm going to try R5
after official R5 is released.
Yellow Dog Linux is yet another version of linux for PPC. It appears that
it has many common features with R5, but will not have the installer and
Netscape Communicator.
It seems that the most important (and relevant?) feature of these two
flavors of linux is that they use glibc2 instead of libc5, which was the C
library on R4. This means everything relating to dynamically loaded code is
changed.
Disclaimer: This is just a superficial observation based on reading the
LinuxPPC website. I have no actual experience with LinuxPPC, as I intend to
install it for the first time on my mac when R5 is out.
Herouth
--
Herouth Maoz, Internet developer.
Open University of Israel - Telem project
http://telem.openu.ac.il/~herutma