Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

Euler Taveira wrote:
On 27-05-2012 10:45, Fujii Masao wrote:

OK, let me propose another approach: add pg_size_pretty(int).
If we do this, all usability and performance problems will be
solved.

I wouldn't like to add another function but if it solves both
problems... +1.

It fixes Tom's example and doesn't break anything else I can find, so
+1.

Is any further overloading needed to cover other cases which
previously worked, or does this cover it?

-Kevin