server vs foreign server inconsistency
Hi,
A few days ago i was wondering why we use CREATE/DROP SERVER but then
when we want to GRANT/REVOKE we need to use FOREIGN SERVER.
of course options are:
1) modify both to accept both forms
2) modify one of them to accept both forms and use that way in all our
examples in docs
3) do nothing at all
IMHO i think 3 is not acceptable because it's annoying
opinions?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
Phone: +593 4 5107566 Cell: +593 987171157
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
A few days ago i was wondering why we use CREATE/DROP SERVER but then
when we want to GRANT/REVOKE we need to use FOREIGN SERVER.
Because the SQL standard says so.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers