Typo fixes in Solution.pm, part of MSVC scripts

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:

I noticed a couple of typos in Solution.pm, fixed by the patch
attached.

I think you meant to send this to the main -hackers list?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc

Hi all,

I noticed a couple of typos in Solution.pm, fixed by the patch
attached. Those things have been introduced by commits cec8394 (visual
2013 support) and 0a78320 (latest pgident run, not actually a problem
of pgident, because of a misuse of commas).
The tab problems should not be backpatched to 9.3, but the use of
commas instead of semicolons should be.

Regards,
--
Michael

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:

I noticed a couple of typos in Solution.pm, fixed by the patch
attached.

I think you meant to send this to the main -hackers list?

Oops. Sorry. Thanks for noticing.
--
Michael

--
Sent via pgsql-odbc mailing list (pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-odbc

On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:

I noticed a couple of typos in Solution.pm, fixed by the patch
attached. Those things have been introduced by commits cec8394 (visual
2013 support) and 0a78320 (latest pgident run, not actually a problem
of pgident, because of a misuse of commas).
The tab problems should not be backpatched to 9.3, but the use of
commas instead of semicolons should be.

I suspect it would be good, then, to separate this into two patches,
one for back-patch and one not.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

I suspect it would be good, then, to separate this into two patches,
one for back-patch and one not.

Attached are patches for master and 9.3. 9.2 and older versions are
not impacted.
Regards,
--
Michael

On 05/30/2014 10:25 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

I suspect it would be good, then, to separate this into two patches,
one for back-patch and one not.

Attached are patches for master and 9.3. 9.2 and older versions are
not impacted.

Thanks, applied.

- Heikki

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers