pg_upgrade problem

Started by Oliver Elphickover 26 years ago4 messages
#1Oliver Elphick
olly@lfix.co.uk

I am updating a database from 6.4 to 6.5. This statement was produced
by 6.4.2's pg_dumpall but is not accepted by 6.5:

CREATE RULE "rtest_v1_upd" AS ON UPDATE TO "rtest_v1"
DO INSTEAD UPDATE rtest_t1 SET "a" = new."a", "b" = new."b"
WHERE "a" = current."a";

ERROR: current: Table does not exist.

This rule is part of the regression tests and it seems that `current' has
now been changed to `old'. Apart from the error messages that occur
as the script flows past (too fast to read) pg_upgrade does not
offer any explanations; it merely says that psql failed to run the
script, which is contrary to what the user (me) thinks he has just seen.

This particular problem can be fixed by applying this sed command to
the script:

sed -e '/^CREATE RULE /s/current\./old./g'

with some smallish risk of breaking rules where some table has a name
ending in `current'.

I'm currently trying to fix the automatic upgrade procedure for Debian's
postgresql package. Are there any other problems like this that people
might meet?

I attach a patch for pg_upgrade. This does two things:

1. check whether the program is being executed in $PGDATA/.. This is
necessary if the data tree is not in the standard place, as is the
case with the Debian distribution (because of Debian policy).

2. give a clearer error message if the dumped data structure fails to
be loaded.

===================== start patch =================
*** src/bin/pg_dump/pg_upgrade~	Mon Jun  7 22:13:00 1999
--- src/bin/pg_dump/pg_upgrade	Mon Jun  7 22:11:13 1999
***************
*** 29,36 ****

# check things

! if [ ! -f "./lib/global1.bki.source" ]
! then echo "$0 must be run from the top of the postgres directory tree." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

--- 29,37 ----

# check things

! if [ ! -f "./data/PG_VERSION" ]
! then echo "`basename $0` must be run from the directory containing
! the database directory \`data' (`dirname $PGDATA`.)" 1>&2
exit 1
fi

***************
*** 72,78 ****
psql "template1" <"/tmp/$$"

if [ $? -ne 0 ]
! then echo "psql failed to execute $INPUT script." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

--- 73,80 ----
  psql "template1" <"/tmp/$$"

if [ $? -ne 0 ]
! then echo "There were errors in the input script $INPUT.
! $0 aborted." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

===================== end patch =================

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the
end it leads to death."
Proverbs 16:25

#2Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Oliver Elphick (#1)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade problem

I am updating a database from 6.4 to 6.5. This statement was produced
by 6.4.2's pg_dumpall but is not accepted by 6.5:

CREATE RULE "rtest_v1_upd" AS ON UPDATE TO "rtest_v1"
DO INSTEAD UPDATE rtest_t1 SET "a" = new."a", "b" = new."b"
WHERE "a" = current."a";

ERROR: current: Table does not exist.

This rule is part of the regression tests and it seems that `current' has
now been changed to `old'. Apart from the error messages that occur
as the script flows past (too fast to read) pg_upgrade does not
offer any explanations; it merely says that psql failed to run the
script, which is contrary to what the user (me) thinks he has just seen.

Yikes. I forgot to disable pg_upgrade in this release. I don't think
it is going to work because the on-disk tuple structures has changed for
MVCC? Vadim, an I correct?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#3Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
In reply to: Oliver Elphick (#1)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade problem

Applied.

I attach a patch for pg_upgrade. This does two things:

1. check whether the program is being executed in $PGDATA/.. This is
necessary if the data tree is not in the standard place, as is the
case with the Debian distribution (because of Debian policy).

2. give a clearer error message if the dumped data structure fails to
be loaded.

===================== start patch =================
*** src/bin/pg_dump/pg_upgrade~	Mon Jun  7 22:13:00 1999
--- src/bin/pg_dump/pg_upgrade	Mon Jun  7 22:11:13 1999
***************
*** 29,36 ****

# check things

! if [ ! -f "./lib/global1.bki.source" ]
! then echo "$0 must be run from the top of the postgres directory tree." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

--- 29,37 ----

# check things

! if [ ! -f "./data/PG_VERSION" ]
! then echo "`basename $0` must be run from the directory containing
! the database directory \`data' (`dirname $PGDATA`.)" 1>&2
exit 1
fi

***************
*** 72,78 ****
psql "template1" <"/tmp/$$"

if [ $? -ne 0 ]
! then echo "psql failed to execute $INPUT script." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

--- 73,80 ----
psql "template1" <"/tmp/$$"

if [ $? -ne 0 ]
! then echo "There were errors in the input script $INPUT.
! $0 aborted." 1>&2
exit 1
fi

===================== end patch =================

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
PGP key from public servers; key ID 32B8FAA1
========================================
"There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the
end it leads to death."
Proverbs 16:25

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
#4Vadim Mikheev
vadim@krs.ru
In reply to: Bruce Momjian (#2)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade problem

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Yikes. I forgot to disable pg_upgrade in this release. I don't think
it is going to work because the on-disk tuple structures has changed for
MVCC? Vadim, an I correct?

Not for MVCC, but we get rid t_len from tuple header.

Vadim