Re: Buildfarm not happy with test module move

Started by Alvaro Herreraabout 11 years ago8 messages
#1Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com

Tom Lane wrote:

All of the MSVC critters are failing at "make check".

Yeah, I noticed that, thanks. As far as I can see the only way to fix
it is to install dummy_seclabel to run the core seclabel test. That
doesn't seem smart; I think it'd be better to remove that part of the
core seclabel test, and move the rest of the test to a new test in the
dummy_seclabel module.

(BTW, why has the commit message not come through on pgsql-committers?)

That was my fault -- the alvh.no-ip.org domain was deleted, and the
email system in postgresql.org rejected the commit message because the
sender was not in a deliverable domain. I noticed within a few hours,
but the damage was already done.

--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.twitter.com/alvherre

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#2Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#1)

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

All of the MSVC critters are failing at "make check".

Yeah, I noticed that, thanks. As far as I can see the only way to fix
it is to install dummy_seclabel to run the core seclabel test. That
doesn't seem smart; I think it'd be better to remove that part of the
core seclabel test, and move the rest of the test to a new test in the
dummy_seclabel module.

Sounds good to me. The other parts of the core tests that depend on
contrib modules aren't exactly good models to follow.

That was my fault -- the alvh.no-ip.org domain was deleted, and the
email system in postgresql.org rejected the commit message because the
sender was not in a deliverable domain. I noticed within a few hours,
but the damage was already done.

I guess I'm confused about which is your preferred email address?

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#3Magnus Hagander
magnus@hagander.net
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

That was my fault -- the alvh.no-ip.org domain was deleted, and the
email system in postgresql.org rejected the commit message because the
sender was not in a deliverable domain. I noticed within a few hours,
but the damage was already done.

I guess I'm confused about which is your preferred email address?

Yeah. I was assuming the alvh.no-ip.org was going to come back, as
that's what you're still subcribed to critical mailinglists with :) Do
you need that one changed?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#4Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Magnus Hagander (#3)

Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

That was my fault -- the alvh.no-ip.org domain was deleted, and the
email system in postgresql.org rejected the commit message because the
sender was not in a deliverable domain. I noticed within a few hours,
but the damage was already done.

I guess I'm confused about which is your preferred email address?

Yeah. I was assuming the alvh.no-ip.org was going to come back, as
that's what you're still subcribed to critical mailinglists with :) Do
you need that one changed?

My preferred email address continues to be alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org. It
was deleted by mistake, it wasn't intended. (If you must know, it's a
new idiotic "feature" by no-ip.com, coupled by my server machine at home
dying because of a "stuck" SSD, which I thought was non-critical so
didn't replace in over half a year, coupled with a change in laptop;
goes to show that the non-critical machine wasn't really non-critical
after all, and that I'm juggling with way too many things.)

--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#5Magnus Hagander
magnus@hagander.net
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#4)

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

Magnus Hagander wrote:

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

That was my fault -- the alvh.no-ip.org domain was deleted, and the
email system in postgresql.org rejected the commit message because the
sender was not in a deliverable domain. I noticed within a few hours,
but the damage was already done.

I guess I'm confused about which is your preferred email address?

Yeah. I was assuming the alvh.no-ip.org was going to come back, as
that's what you're still subcribed to critical mailinglists with :) Do
you need that one changed?

My preferred email address continues to be alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org. It
was deleted by mistake, it wasn't intended. (If you must know, it's a
new idiotic "feature" by no-ip.com, coupled by my server machine at home
dying because of a "stuck" SSD, which I thought was non-critical so
didn't replace in over half a year, coupled with a change in laptop;
goes to show that the non-critical machine wasn't really non-critical
after all, and that I'm juggling with way too many things.)

Ok, good! Will add you back to the list you were dropped from - but
you'll want to doublecheck all other lists as well :)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#6Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#2)

Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

All of the MSVC critters are failing at "make check".

Yeah, I noticed that, thanks. As far as I can see the only way to fix
it is to install dummy_seclabel to run the core seclabel test. That
doesn't seem smart; I think it'd be better to remove that part of the
core seclabel test, and move the rest of the test to a new test in the
dummy_seclabel module.

Sounds good to me. The other parts of the core tests that depend on
contrib modules aren't exactly good models to follow.

Pushed; tests pass for me, let's see what buildfarm says.

I think the input/ and output/ stuff is rather annoying. I tried to
make dummy_seclabel an extension instead of a bare library, so that
CREATE EXTENSION inside the .sql loads it easily. The problem there is
that dummy_seclabel doesn't have any sql-callable function, so the
module doesn't ever load. I guess we could create a dummy function
which is there only to cause the module to get loaded ...

I am in touch with Andrew about adding a new stage to buildfarm client
so that animals will build src/test/modules by default. It should work
fine everywhere except MSVC, I think. The issue with MSVC continues to
be that Install.pm and Mkvcbuild.pm need to be in sync regarding what to
build and what to install. I could use help from some MSVC-enabled
developer there ...

In the meantime, I'm going to rebase commit_ts to src/test/modules and
get one bug I found there fixed, and will push that shortly too.

--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#7Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Alvaro Herrera (#6)

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

Sounds good to me. The other parts of the core tests that depend on
contrib modules aren't exactly good models to follow.

Pushed; tests pass for me, let's see what buildfarm says.

Pushed? Don't see it ...

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#8Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#7)

Tom Lane wrote:

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Tom Lane wrote:

Sounds good to me. The other parts of the core tests that depend on
contrib modules aren't exactly good models to follow.

Pushed; tests pass for me, let's see what buildfarm says.

Pushed? Don't see it ...

Meh. Done for real this time.

--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers