False comment about speculative insertion

Started by Peter Geogheganalmost 11 years ago2 messageshackers
Jump to latest

Attached patch removes a reference to an executor README section about
speculative insertion. In fact, the high-level overview of speculative
insertion ended up at the top of execIndexing.c. The executor README
was not touched by the ON CONFLICT patch at all.

I don't think it's necessary to refer to execIndexing.c within
ExecInsert instead. All the routines being called from ExecInsert()
that relate to speculative insertion are in execIndexing.c anyway.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachments:

0001-Remove-false-comment-about-speculative-insertion.patchtext/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name=0001-Remove-false-comment-about-speculative-insertion.patchDownload+1-3
#2Heikki Linnakangas
heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com
In reply to: Peter Geoghegan (#1)
Re: False comment about speculative insertion

On 07/26/2015 10:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:

Attached patch removes a reference to an executor README section about
speculative insertion. In fact, the high-level overview of speculative
insertion ended up at the top of execIndexing.c. The executor README
was not touched by the ON CONFLICT patch at all.

I don't think it's necessary to refer to execIndexing.c within
ExecInsert instead. All the routines being called from ExecInsert()
that relate to speculative insertion are in execIndexing.c anyway.

Fixed, thanks.

- Heikki

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers