pltcl: sentence improvement
Hi,
This simple patch improves a sentence. Spotted while working on translation.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
Attachments:
0001-Improve-sentence.patchtext/x-patch; name=0001-Improve-sentence.patchDownload
>From 7cae997155e222e0a8280018cccf717ab2ee1c38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:58:52 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] Improve sentence.
Sentence is now consistent with a backend one.
---
src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c b/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c
index edfda59..3dcb31f 100644
--- a/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c
+++ b/src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ pltcl_trigger_handler(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS, bool pltrusted)
if (ret_numvals % 2 != 0)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_E_R_I_E_TRIGGER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATED),
- errmsg("invalid return list from trigger - must have even # of elements")));
+ errmsg("invalid return list from trigger - must have even number of elements")));
modattrs = (int *) palloc(tupdesc->natts * sizeof(int));
modvalues = (Datum *) palloc(tupdesc->natts * sizeof(Datum));
--
2.1.4
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes:
This simple patch improves a sentence. Spotted while working on translation.
I concur that spelling out "#" as "number" is an improvement, but I'm
curious which backend error you think this matches?
Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
elements"?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 16-09-2015 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes:
This simple patch improves a sentence. Spotted while working on translation.
I concur that spelling out "#" as "number" is an improvement, but I'm
curious which backend error you think this matches?
It is sort of...
utils/adt/json.c
2088 ereport(ERROR,
2089 (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
2090 errmsg("argument list must have even number of
elements"),
2091 errhint("The arguments of json_build_object() must
consist of alternating keys and values.")));
replication/logical/logicalfuncs.c
361 ereport(ERROR,
362 (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
363 errmsg("array must have even number of
elements")));
Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
elements"?
Works for me.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
elements"?
I agree a full rewrite is sensible, but that particular wording looks
slightly odd to me. I would either have added an "an", or pluralized
the subject, so either
"trigger's return list must have an even number of elements"
or
"trigger's return lists must have even number of elements"
However I notice that the "must have even number" wording (and others
where "must have" is not followed by an indefinite article) is already
used in other places, so maybe it's just an English quirk.
--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes:
On 16-09-2015 10:57, Tom Lane wrote:
Also, if we're going to change this message at all, I'm inclined to
rewrite it completely, because it doesn't really follow the style
guidelines. How about "trigger's return list must have even number of
elements"?
Works for me.
Looking around, I noticed a couple of other error messages using "#"
as an abbreviation. I changed those too.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
I agree a full rewrite is sensible, but that particular wording looks
slightly odd to me. I would either have added an "an", or pluralized
the subject, so either
"trigger's return list must have an even number of elements"
or
"trigger's return lists must have even number of elements"
There's only one list involved, so the second doesn't seem right to me.
I don't have a problem with adding "an", but as you say, we elide such
articles elsewhere too. Feel free to change it if you like.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers