Use EVP API pgcrypto encryption, dropping support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 and older
pgcrypto uses the old, deprecated, "low-level" functions for symmetric
encryption, with algorithm-specific functions like AES_ecb_encrypt(),
DES_ecb3_encrypt() and so forth. The recommended new API is the
so-called EVP API, which has functions for initializing a "context"
using a specific algorithm, and then that context is passed around to
EVP_Encrypt*/Decrypt* functions. The EVP API has been around for ages,
at least since OpenSSL 0.9.6.
We should switch to the new API. Aside from being nicer, the low-level
functions don't (necessarily) use hardware acceleration, while the EVP
functions do. I could see a significant boost to pgcrypto AES encryption
on my laptop, which has an Intel CPU that supports the special AES-NI
instructions. That said, AES encryption is pretty fast anyway, so you
need very large inputs to see any difference and it's actually pretty
difficult to come up with a test case where the gains are not lost in
the noise of e.g. toasting/detoasting the data. Nevertheless, it's a
nice bonus. Test case is attached (aes-speedtest.sql). It runs in about
1.7s with the old API, and 1.3s with the new API.
The real reason I started digging this, though, is that Pivotal was
trying to use the FIPS-validated version of OpenSSL with PostgreSQL, and
it turns out that the low-level APIs are disabled in "FIPS mode", and
trip an assertion inside OpenSSL (that changed some time between 0.9.8
and 1.0.2, not sure when exactly). Switching to the EVP functions will
avoid that problem. There is obviously a lot more you'd need to do
before you could actually FIPS-certify PostgreSQL and pgcrypto, but this
is one unnecessary hurdle.
There was prior discussion on the EVP API in this old thread from 2007:
/messages/by-id/46A5E284.7030402@sun.com
In short, pgcrypto actually used to use the EVP functions, but was
changed to *not* use them, because in older versions of OpenSSL, some
key lengths and/or padding options that pgcrypto supports were not
supported by the EVP API. That was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7, however. The
consensus in 2007 was that we could drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 and
below, so that should definitely be OK by now, if we haven't already
done that elsewhere in the code.
Any objections to the attached two patches?
- Heikki
Attachments:
0001-Remove-support-for-OpenSSL-versions-before-0.9.7.patchapplication/x-patch; name=0001-Remove-support-for-OpenSSL-versions-before-0.9.7.patchDownload
From 9cbf787e22b06b56b2cd05d871feb09c684094b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:43:44 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Remove support for OpenSSL versions before 0.9.7
This makes the code simpler.
---
contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c | 116 +--------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 115 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c b/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
index 976af70..bd257b0 100644
--- a/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
+++ b/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include "px.h"
#include <openssl/evp.h>
+#include <openssl/aes.h>
#include <openssl/blowfish.h>
#include <openssl/cast.h>
#include <openssl/des.h>
@@ -47,121 +48,6 @@
#define MAX_IV (128/8)
/*
- * Compatibility with OpenSSL 0.9.6
- *
- * It needs AES and newer DES and digest API.
- */
-#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER >= 0x00907000L
-
-/*
- * Nothing needed for OpenSSL 0.9.7+
- */
-
-#include <openssl/aes.h>
-#else /* old OPENSSL */
-
-/*
- * Emulate OpenSSL AES.
- */
-
-#include "rijndael.c"
-
-#define AES_ENCRYPT 1
-#define AES_DECRYPT 0
-#define AES_KEY rijndael_ctx
-
-static int
-AES_set_encrypt_key(const uint8 *key, int kbits, AES_KEY *ctx)
-{
- aes_set_key(ctx, key, kbits, 1);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-AES_set_decrypt_key(const uint8 *key, int kbits, AES_KEY *ctx)
-{
- aes_set_key(ctx, key, kbits, 0);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void
-AES_ecb_encrypt(const uint8 *src, uint8 *dst, AES_KEY *ctx, int enc)
-{
- memcpy(dst, src, 16);
- if (enc)
- aes_ecb_encrypt(ctx, dst, 16);
- else
- aes_ecb_decrypt(ctx, dst, 16);
-}
-
-static void
-AES_cbc_encrypt(const uint8 *src, uint8 *dst, int len, AES_KEY *ctx, uint8 *iv, int enc)
-{
- memcpy(dst, src, len);
- if (enc)
- {
- aes_cbc_encrypt(ctx, iv, dst, len);
- memcpy(iv, dst + len - 16, 16);
- }
- else
- {
- aes_cbc_decrypt(ctx, iv, dst, len);
- memcpy(iv, src + len - 16, 16);
- }
-}
-
-/*
- * Emulate DES_* API
- */
-
-#define DES_key_schedule des_key_schedule
-#define DES_cblock des_cblock
-#define DES_set_key(k, ks) \
- des_set_key((k), *(ks))
-#define DES_ecb_encrypt(i, o, k, e) \
- des_ecb_encrypt((i), (o), *(k), (e))
-#define DES_ncbc_encrypt(i, o, l, k, iv, e) \
- des_ncbc_encrypt((i), (o), (l), *(k), (iv), (e))
-#define DES_ecb3_encrypt(i, o, k1, k2, k3, e) \
- des_ecb3_encrypt((des_cblock *)(i), (des_cblock *)(o), \
- *(k1), *(k2), *(k3), (e))
-#define DES_ede3_cbc_encrypt(i, o, l, k1, k2, k3, iv, e) \
- des_ede3_cbc_encrypt((i), (o), \
- (l), *(k1), *(k2), *(k3), (iv), (e))
-
-/*
- * Emulate newer digest API.
- */
-
-static void
-EVP_MD_CTX_init(EVP_MD_CTX *ctx)
-{
- memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
-}
-
-static int
-EVP_MD_CTX_cleanup(EVP_MD_CTX *ctx)
-{
- px_memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
- return 1;
-}
-
-static int
-EVP_DigestInit_ex(EVP_MD_CTX *ctx, const EVP_MD *md, void *engine)
-{
- EVP_DigestInit(ctx, md);
- return 1;
-}
-
-static int
-EVP_DigestFinal_ex(EVP_MD_CTX *ctx, unsigned char *res, unsigned int *len)
-{
- EVP_DigestFinal(ctx, res, len);
- return 1;
-}
-#endif /* old OpenSSL */
-
-/*
* Provide SHA2 for older OpenSSL < 0.9.8
*/
#if OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER < 0x00908000L
--
2.1.4
0002-Use-EVP-API-for-OpenSSL-symmetric-encryption.patchapplication/x-patch; name=0002-Use-EVP-API-for-OpenSSL-symmetric-encryption.patchDownload
From dfe31c2211abb1adedfd40bc4480c0e2373fe10b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 15:44:28 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Use EVP API for OpenSSL symmetric encryption.
The old "low-level" API is deprecated, and doesn't support hardware
acceleration. And this makes the code simpler, too.
---
contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c | 545 +++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 176 insertions(+), 369 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c b/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
index bd257b0..ab590e8 100644
--- a/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
+++ b/contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
@@ -34,10 +34,6 @@
#include "px.h"
#include <openssl/evp.h>
-#include <openssl/aes.h>
-#include <openssl/blowfish.h>
-#include <openssl/cast.h>
-#include <openssl/des.h>
#include <openssl/rand.h>
#include <openssl/err.h>
@@ -194,39 +190,24 @@ px_find_digest(const char *name, PX_MD **res)
* So need to manage ciphers ourselves.
*/
+/*
+ * prototype for the EVP functions that return an algorithm, e.g.
+ * EVP_aes_128_cbc().
+ */
+typedef const EVP_CIPHER *(*ossl_EVP_cipher_func)(void);
+
struct ossl_cipher
{
int (*init) (PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv);
- int (*encrypt) (PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res);
- int (*decrypt) (PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res);
-
+ ossl_EVP_cipher_func cipher_func;
int block_size;
int max_key_size;
- int stream_cipher;
};
typedef struct
{
- union
- {
- struct
- {
- BF_KEY key;
- int num;
- } bf;
- struct
- {
- DES_key_schedule key_schedule;
- } des;
- struct
- {
- DES_key_schedule k1,
- k2,
- k3;
- } des3;
- CAST_KEY cast_key;
- AES_KEY aes_key;
- } u;
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX evp_ctx;
+ const EVP_CIPHER *evp_ciph;
uint8 key[MAX_KEY];
uint8 iv[MAX_IV];
unsigned klen;
@@ -234,7 +215,7 @@ typedef struct
const struct ossl_cipher *ciph;
} ossldata;
-/* generic */
+/* Common routines for all algorithms */
static unsigned
gen_ossl_block_size(PX_Cipher *c)
@@ -267,11 +248,62 @@ gen_ossl_free(PX_Cipher *c)
{
ossldata *od = (ossldata *) c->ptr;
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_cleanup(&od->evp_ctx);
px_memset(od, 0, sizeof(*od));
px_free(od);
px_free(c);
}
+static int
+gen_ossl_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
+ uint8 *res)
+{
+ ossldata *od = c->ptr;
+ int outlen;
+
+ if (!od->init)
+ {
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(&od->evp_ctx);
+ if (!EVP_DecryptInit_ex(&od->evp_ctx, od->evp_ciph, NULL, NULL, NULL))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ if (!EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length(&od->evp_ctx, od->klen))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ if (!EVP_DecryptInit_ex(&od->evp_ctx, NULL, NULL, od->key, od->iv))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ od->init = true;
+ }
+
+ if (!EVP_DecryptUpdate(&od->evp_ctx, res, &outlen, data, dlen))
+ return PXE_DECRYPT_FAILED;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+gen_ossl_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
+ uint8 *res)
+{
+ ossldata *od = c->ptr;
+ int outlen;
+
+ if (!od->init)
+ {
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(&od->evp_ctx);
+ if (!EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&od->evp_ctx, od->evp_ciph, NULL, NULL, NULL))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ if (!EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length(&od->evp_ctx, od->klen))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ if (!EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&od->evp_ctx, NULL, NULL, od->key, od->iv))
+ return PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ od->init = true;
+ }
+
+ if (!EVP_EncryptUpdate(&od->evp_ctx, res, &outlen, data, dlen))
+ return PXE_ERR_GENERIC;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* Blowfish */
/*
@@ -293,13 +325,21 @@ bf_check_supported_key_len(void)
static const uint8 data[8] = {0xfe, 0xdc, 0xba, 0x98, 0x76, 0x54, 0x32, 0x10};
static const uint8 res[8] = {0xc0, 0x45, 0x04, 0x01, 0x2e, 0x4e, 0x1f, 0x53};
- static uint8 out[8];
-
- BF_KEY bf_key;
+ uint8 out[8];
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX evp_ctx;
+ int outlen;
/* encrypt with 448bits key and verify output */
- BF_set_key(&bf_key, 56, key);
- BF_ecb_encrypt(data, out, &bf_key, BF_ENCRYPT);
+ EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(&evp_ctx);
+ if (!EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&evp_ctx, EVP_bf_ecb(), NULL, NULL, NULL))
+ return 0;
+ if (!EVP_CIPHER_CTX_set_key_length(&evp_ctx, 56))
+ return 0;
+ if (!EVP_EncryptInit_ex(&evp_ctx, NULL, NULL, key, NULL))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!EVP_EncryptUpdate(&evp_ctx, out, &outlen, data, 8))
+ return 0;
if (memcmp(out, res, 8) != 0)
return 0; /* Output does not match -> strong cipher is
@@ -311,6 +351,7 @@ static int
bf_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
{
ossldata *od = c->ptr;
+ unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
static int bf_is_strong = -1;
/*
@@ -326,74 +367,13 @@ bf_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
return PXE_KEY_TOO_BIG;
/* Key len is supported. We can use it. */
- BF_set_key(&od->u.bf.key, klen, key);
+ od->klen = klen;
+ memcpy(od->key, key, klen);
+
if (iv)
- memcpy(od->iv, iv, BF_BLOCK);
+ memcpy(od->iv, iv, bs);
else
- memset(od->iv, 0, BF_BLOCK);
- od->u.bf.num = 0;
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_ecb_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- unsigned i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- BF_ecb_encrypt(data + i * bs, res + i * bs, &od->u.bf.key, BF_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_ecb_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c),
- i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- BF_ecb_encrypt(data + i * bs, res + i * bs, &od->u.bf.key, BF_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_cbc_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- BF_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.bf.key, od->iv, BF_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_cbc_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- BF_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.bf.key, od->iv, BF_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_cfb64_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- BF_cfb64_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.bf.key, od->iv,
- &od->u.bf.num, BF_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-bf_cfb64_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- BF_cfb64_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.bf.key, od->iv,
- &od->u.bf.num, BF_DECRYPT);
+ memset(od->iv, 0, bs);
return 0;
}
@@ -403,69 +383,16 @@ static int
ossl_des_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
{
ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- DES_cblock xkey;
+ unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- memset(&xkey, 0, sizeof(xkey));
- memcpy(&xkey, key, klen > 8 ? 8 : klen);
- DES_set_key(&xkey, &od->u.des.key_schedule);
- memset(&xkey, 0, sizeof(xkey));
+ od->klen = 8;
+ memset(od->key, 0, 8);
+ memcpy(od->key, key, klen > 8 ? 8 : klen);
if (iv)
- memcpy(od->iv, iv, 8);
+ memcpy(od->iv, iv, bs);
else
- memset(od->iv, 0, 8);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des_ecb_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- unsigned i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- DES_ecb_encrypt((DES_cblock *) (data + i * bs),
- (DES_cblock *) (res + i * bs),
- &od->u.des.key_schedule, 1);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des_ecb_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- unsigned i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- DES_ecb_encrypt((DES_cblock *) (data + i * bs),
- (DES_cblock *) (res + i * bs),
- &od->u.des.key_schedule, 0);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des_cbc_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- DES_ncbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.des.key_schedule,
- (DES_cblock *) od->iv, 1);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des_cbc_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- DES_ncbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.des.key_schedule,
- (DES_cblock *) od->iv, 0);
+ memset(od->iv, 0, bs);
return 0;
}
@@ -475,82 +402,16 @@ static int
ossl_des3_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
{
ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- DES_cblock xkey1,
- xkey2,
- xkey3;
-
- memset(&xkey1, 0, sizeof(xkey1));
- memset(&xkey2, 0, sizeof(xkey2));
- memset(&xkey3, 0, sizeof(xkey3));
- memcpy(&xkey1, key, klen > 8 ? 8 : klen);
- if (klen > 8)
- memcpy(&xkey2, key + 8, (klen - 8) > 8 ? 8 : (klen - 8));
- if (klen > 16)
- memcpy(&xkey3, key + 16, (klen - 16) > 8 ? 8 : (klen - 16));
-
- DES_set_key(&xkey1, &od->u.des3.k1);
- DES_set_key(&xkey2, &od->u.des3.k2);
- DES_set_key(&xkey3, &od->u.des3.k3);
- memset(&xkey1, 0, sizeof(xkey1));
- memset(&xkey2, 0, sizeof(xkey2));
- memset(&xkey3, 0, sizeof(xkey3));
-
- if (iv)
- memcpy(od->iv, iv, 8);
- else
- memset(od->iv, 0, 8);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des3_ecb_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- unsigned i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- DES_ecb3_encrypt((void *) (data + i * bs), (void *) (res + i * bs),
- &od->u.des3.k1, &od->u.des3.k2, &od->u.des3.k3, 1);
- return 0;
-}
-static int
-ossl_des3_ecb_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- unsigned i;
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- for (i = 0; i < dlen / bs; i++)
- DES_ecb3_encrypt((void *) (data + i * bs), (void *) (res + i * bs),
- &od->u.des3.k1, &od->u.des3.k2, &od->u.des3.k3, 0);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des3_cbc_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- DES_ede3_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen,
- &od->u.des3.k1, &od->u.des3.k2, &od->u.des3.k3,
- (DES_cblock *) od->iv, 1);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_des3_cbc_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
+ od->klen = 24;
+ memset(od->key, 0, 24);
+ memcpy(od->key, key, klen > 24 ? 24 : klen);
- DES_ede3_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen,
- &od->u.des3.k1, &od->u.des3.k2, &od->u.des3.k3,
- (DES_cblock *) od->iv, 0);
+ if (iv)
+ memcpy(od->iv, iv, bs);
+ else
+ memset(od->iv, 0, bs);
return 0;
}
@@ -562,7 +423,9 @@ ossl_cast_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
ossldata *od = c->ptr;
unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- CAST_set_key(&od->u.cast_key, klen, key);
+ od->klen = klen;
+ memcpy(od->key, key, klen);
+
if (iv)
memcpy(od->iv, iv, bs);
else
@@ -570,48 +433,6 @@ ossl_cast_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
return 0;
}
-static int
-ossl_cast_ecb_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- const uint8 *end = data + dlen - bs;
-
- for (; data <= end; data += bs, res += bs)
- CAST_ecb_encrypt(data, res, &od->u.cast_key, CAST_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_cast_ecb_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- const uint8 *end = data + dlen - bs;
-
- for (; data <= end; data += bs, res += bs)
- CAST_ecb_encrypt(data, res, &od->u.cast_key, CAST_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_cast_cbc_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- CAST_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.cast_key, od->iv, CAST_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_cast_cbc_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen, uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
-
- CAST_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.cast_key, od->iv, CAST_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
/* AES */
static int
@@ -635,96 +456,68 @@ ossl_aes_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
memcpy(od->iv, iv, bs);
else
memset(od->iv, 0, bs);
+
return 0;
}
static int
-ossl_aes_key_init(ossldata *od, int type)
+ossl_aes_ecb_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
{
+ ossldata *od = c->ptr;
int err;
- /*
- * Strong key support could be missing on some openssl installations. We
- * must check return value from set key function.
- */
- if (type == AES_ENCRYPT)
- err = AES_set_encrypt_key(od->key, od->klen * 8, &od->u.aes_key);
- else
- err = AES_set_decrypt_key(od->key, od->klen * 8, &od->u.aes_key);
+ err = ossl_aes_init(c, key, klen, iv);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
- if (err == 0)
+ switch (od->klen)
{
- od->init = 1;
- return 0;
+ case 128 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_128_ecb();
+ break;
+ case 192 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_192_ecb();
+ break;
+ case 256 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_256_ecb();
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* shouldn't happen */
+ err = PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ break;
}
- od->init = 0;
- return PXE_KEY_TOO_BIG;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_aes_ecb_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- const uint8 *end = data + dlen - bs;
- int err;
- if (!od->init)
- if ((err = ossl_aes_key_init(od, AES_ENCRYPT)) != 0)
- return err;
-
- for (; data <= end; data += bs, res += bs)
- AES_ecb_encrypt(data, res, &od->u.aes_key, AES_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
+ return err;
}
static int
-ossl_aes_ecb_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
+ossl_aes_cbc_init(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *key, unsigned klen, const uint8 *iv)
{
- unsigned bs = gen_ossl_block_size(c);
ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- const uint8 *end = data + dlen - bs;
int err;
- if (!od->init)
- if ((err = ossl_aes_key_init(od, AES_DECRYPT)) != 0)
- return err;
-
- for (; data <= end; data += bs, res += bs)
- AES_ecb_encrypt(data, res, &od->u.aes_key, AES_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int
-ossl_aes_cbc_encrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- int err;
-
- if (!od->init)
- if ((err = ossl_aes_key_init(od, AES_ENCRYPT)) != 0)
- return err;
-
- AES_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.aes_key, od->iv, AES_ENCRYPT);
- return 0;
-}
+ err = ossl_aes_init(c, key, klen, iv);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
-static int
-ossl_aes_cbc_decrypt(PX_Cipher *c, const uint8 *data, unsigned dlen,
- uint8 *res)
-{
- ossldata *od = c->ptr;
- int err;
-
- if (!od->init)
- if ((err = ossl_aes_key_init(od, AES_DECRYPT)) != 0)
- return err;
+ switch (od->klen)
+ {
+ case 128 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_128_cbc();
+ break;
+ case 192 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_192_cbc();
+ break;
+ case 256 / 8:
+ od->evp_ciph = EVP_aes_256_cbc();
+ break;
+ default:
+ /* shouldn't happen */
+ err = PXE_CIPHER_INIT;
+ break;
+ }
- AES_cbc_encrypt(data, res, dlen, &od->u.aes_key, od->iv, AES_DECRYPT);
- return 0;
+ return err;
}
/*
@@ -750,58 +543,69 @@ static PX_Alias ossl_aliases[] = {
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_bf_cbc = {
- bf_init, bf_cbc_encrypt, bf_cbc_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 448 / 8, 0
+ bf_init,
+ EVP_bf_cbc,
+ 64 / 8, 448 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_bf_ecb = {
- bf_init, bf_ecb_encrypt, bf_ecb_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 448 / 8, 0
+ bf_init,
+ EVP_bf_ecb,
+ 64 / 8, 448 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_bf_cfb = {
- bf_init, bf_cfb64_encrypt, bf_cfb64_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 448 / 8, 1
+ bf_init,
+ EVP_bf_cfb,
+ 64 / 8, 448 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_des_ecb = {
- ossl_des_init, ossl_des_ecb_encrypt, ossl_des_ecb_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 64 / 8, 0
+ ossl_des_init,
+ EVP_des_ecb,
+ 64 / 8, 64 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_des_cbc = {
- ossl_des_init, ossl_des_cbc_encrypt, ossl_des_cbc_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 64 / 8, 0
+ ossl_des_init,
+ EVP_des_cbc,
+ 64 / 8, 64 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_des3_ecb = {
- ossl_des3_init, ossl_des3_ecb_encrypt, ossl_des3_ecb_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 192 / 8, 0
+ ossl_des3_init,
+ EVP_des_ede3_ecb,
+ 64 / 8, 192 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_des3_cbc = {
- ossl_des3_init, ossl_des3_cbc_encrypt, ossl_des3_cbc_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 192 / 8, 0
+ ossl_des3_init,
+ EVP_des_ede3_cbc,
+ 64 / 8, 192 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_cast_ecb = {
- ossl_cast_init, ossl_cast_ecb_encrypt, ossl_cast_ecb_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 128 / 8, 0
+ ossl_cast_init,
+ EVP_cast5_ecb,
+ 64 / 8, 128 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_cast_cbc = {
- ossl_cast_init, ossl_cast_cbc_encrypt, ossl_cast_cbc_decrypt,
- 64 / 8, 128 / 8, 0
+ ossl_cast_init,
+ EVP_cast5_cbc,
+ 64 / 8, 128 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_aes_ecb = {
- ossl_aes_init, ossl_aes_ecb_encrypt, ossl_aes_ecb_decrypt,
- 128 / 8, 256 / 8, 0
+ ossl_aes_ecb_init,
+ NULL, /* EVP_aes_XXX_ecb(), determined in init function */
+ 128 / 8, 256 / 8
};
static const struct ossl_cipher ossl_aes_cbc = {
- ossl_aes_init, ossl_aes_cbc_encrypt, ossl_aes_cbc_decrypt,
- 128 / 8, 256 / 8, 0
+ ossl_aes_cbc_init,
+ NULL, /* EVP_aes_XXX_ccb(), determined in init function */
+ 128 / 8, 256 / 8
};
/*
@@ -848,14 +652,17 @@ px_find_cipher(const char *name, PX_Cipher **res)
memset(od, 0, sizeof(*od));
od->ciph = i->ciph;
+ if (i->ciph->cipher_func)
+ od->evp_ciph = i->ciph->cipher_func();
+
c = px_alloc(sizeof(*c));
c->block_size = gen_ossl_block_size;
c->key_size = gen_ossl_key_size;
c->iv_size = gen_ossl_iv_size;
c->free = gen_ossl_free;
c->init = od->ciph->init;
- c->encrypt = od->ciph->encrypt;
- c->decrypt = od->ciph->decrypt;
+ c->encrypt = gen_ossl_encrypt;
+ c->decrypt = gen_ossl_decrypt;
c->ptr = od;
*res = c;
--
2.1.4
On 10/05/2015 06:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
There was prior discussion on the EVP API in this old thread from 2007:
/messages/by-id/46A5E284.7030402@sun.comIn short, pgcrypto actually used to use the EVP functions, but was
changed to *not* use them, because in older versions of OpenSSL, some
key lengths and/or padding options that pgcrypto supports were not
supported by the EVP API. That was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7, however. The
consensus in 2007 was that we could drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 and
below, so that should definitely be OK by now, if we haven't already
done that elsewhere in the code.Any objections to the attached two patches?
I haven't studied that patches themselves yet, but +1 for the concept.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
In short, pgcrypto actually used to use the EVP functions, but was changed
to *not* use them, because in older versions of OpenSSL, some key lengths
and/or padding options that pgcrypto supports were not supported by the EVP
API. That was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7, however. The consensus in 2007 was
that we could drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 and below, so that should
definitely be OK by now, if we haven't already done that elsewhere in the
code.
I think we already effectively dropped support for < 0.9.7 with the
renegotiation fixes; see
/messages/by-id/20130712203252.GH29206@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2015-10-05 12:16:05 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
In short, pgcrypto actually used to use the EVP functions, but was changed
to *not* use them, because in older versions of OpenSSL, some key lengths
and/or padding options that pgcrypto supports were not supported by the EVP
API. That was fixed in OpenSSL 0.9.7, however. The consensus in 2007 was
that we could drop support for OpenSSL 0.9.6 and below, so that should
definitely be OK by now, if we haven't already done that elsewhere in the
code.I think we already effectively dropped support for < 0.9.7 with the
renegotiation fixes; see
/messages/by-id/20130712203252.GH29206@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
9.5+ do again then :P
But more seriously: Given the upstream support policies from
https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html :
"
Support for version 0.9.8 will cease on 2015-12-31. No further releases of 0.9.8 will be made after that date. Security fixes only will be applied to 0.9.8 until then.
Support for version 1.0.0 will cease on 2015-12-31. No further releases of 1.0.0 will be made after that date. Security fixes only will be applied to 1.0.0 until then.
We may designate a release as a Long Term Support (LTS) release. LTS
releases will be supported for at least five years and we will specify
one at least every four years. Non-LTS releases will be supported for at
least two years.
"
and the amount of security fixes regularly required for openssl, I don't
think we'd do anybody a favor by trying to continue supporting older
versions for a long while.
Note that openssl's security releases are denoted by a letter after the
numeric version, not by the last digit. 0.9.7 was released 30 Dec 2002.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund wrote:
But more seriously: Given the upstream support policies from
https://www.openssl.org/policies/releasestrat.html :
"
Support for version 0.9.8 will cease on 2015-12-31. No further releases of 0.9.8 will be made after that date. Security fixes only will be applied to 0.9.8 until then.
Support for version 1.0.0 will cease on 2015-12-31. No further releases of 1.0.0 will be made after that date. Security fixes only will be applied to 1.0.0 until then.We may designate a release as a Long Term Support (LTS) release. LTS
releases will be supported for at least five years and we will specify
one at least every four years. Non-LTS releases will be supported for at
least two years.
"
and the amount of security fixes regularly required for openssl, I don't
think we'd do anybody a favor by trying to continue supporting older
versions for a long while.Note that openssl's security releases are denoted by a letter after the
numeric version, not by the last digit. 0.9.7 was released 30 Dec 2002.
Yeah. Last of the 0.9.7 line (0.9.7m) was in 2007:
commit 10626fac1569ea37839c37b105681cd08dbe6658
Author: cvs2svn <cvs2svn>
AuthorDate: Fri Feb 23 12:49:10 2007 +0000
CommitDate: Fri Feb 23 12:49:10 2007 +0000
This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create tag 'OpenSSL_0_9_7m'.
Current 0.9.8 is 0.9.8zg, in June this year:
commit 0823ddc56e9aaa1de6c4f57bb45457d5eeca404d
Author: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Jun 11 15:20:22 2015 +0100
CommitDate: Thu Jun 11 15:20:22 2015 +0100
Prepare for 0.9.8zg release
Reviewed-by: Stephen Henson <steve@openssl.org>
--
�lvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Committed this patch now.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Heikki Linnakangas 2016-10-17 <07ebd878-ff09-72d5-7df7-f7fde7b83824@iki.fi>
Committed this patch now.
Hi,
I've just taken up work again on PG 10 on Debian unstable.
With openssl 1.1.0c-2, pgcrypto errors out with:
gcc -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -fexcess-precision=standard -g -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/no-pie-compile.specs -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -I/usr/include/mit-krb5 -fPIC -pie -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fpic -I. -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto -I../../src/include -I/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../src/include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/tcl8.6 -c -o openssl.o /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c:253:17: error: field 'evp_ctx' has incomplete type
EVP_CIPHER_CTX evp_ctx;
^~~~~~~
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c: In function 'bf_check_supported_key_len':
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c:373:17: error: storage size of 'evp_ctx' isn't known
EVP_CIPHER_CTX evp_ctx;
^~~~~~~
/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/build/../contrib/pgcrypto/openssl.c:373:17: warning: unused variable 'evp_ctx' [-Wunused-variable]
<builtin>: recipe for target 'openssl.o' failed
Reverting 5ff4a67f63fd6d3eb01ff9707d4674ed54a89f3b fixes compilation.
(9.6 is fine.)
Christoph
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 12/08/2016 05:51 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
Re: Heikki Linnakangas 2016-10-17 <07ebd878-ff09-72d5-7df7-f7fde7b83824@iki.fi>
Committed this patch now.
Hi,
I've just taken up work again on PG 10 on Debian unstable.
With openssl 1.1.0c-2, pgcrypto errors out with:
Yeah, sorry about that. It's already been discussed at
/messages/by-id/20161201014826.ic72tfkahmevpwz7@alap3.anarazel.de.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers