Pgbench with -f and -S
Hi,
Pgbench allows -f and -S combinations together where the doc says that -S
effectively uses the internal select-only script.
Is it okay to assume that -f is disregarded here? Or are they run in
round-robin fashion (although then, how does it know which read-only part
of my script to run?) or something else like that?
Effectively, I think it should raise NOTICE that -f is useless here.
-
robins
--
-
robins
Pgbench allows -f and -S combinations together where the doc says that -S
effectively uses the internal select-only script.Is it okay to assume that -f is disregarded here? Or are they run in
round-robin fashion (although then, how does it know which read-only part
of my script to run?) or something else like that?Effectively, I think it should raise NOTICE that -f is useless here.
For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be
combined.
Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores,
when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned
about.
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 17 April 2016 at 21:24, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be
combined.Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores,
when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned about.
Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning.
Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom
Script) run, although the dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that.
-
robins
For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be
combined.Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores,
when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warned about.
Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning.Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom
Script) run, although the dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that.
Hmmm... I think it does implicitely, with "add" and "and" in the
following:
From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgbench.html:
-b scriptname[@weight]
Add the specified builtin script to the list of executed scripts. [...]
Idem -f.
And later at the beginning of the Notes:
pgbench executes test scripts chosen randomly from a specified list.
They include built-in scripts with -b and user-provided custom scripts with -f.
[...]
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Got it. Thanks for explaining that. Was looking at -S earlier and didn't
notice the new -b and @ weight options in 9.6devel.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 at 10:54 Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
For the future 9.6, scripts options are cumulatives, so -f & -S can be
combined.Indeed, for the <= 9.5 it seems that some options are silently ignores,
when combining -S/-f, only the last one is kept, it should be warnedabout.
Thanks Fabien, for confirming about the missing warning.Also, by 'combined' I think you mean that both (built-in SELECTs & Custom
Script) run, although the dev docs don't (yet) say anything about that.Hmmm... I think it does implicitely, with "add" and "and" in the
following:From http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgbench.html:
-b scriptname[@weight]
Add the specified builtin script to the list of executed scripts. [...]Idem -f.
And later at the beginning of the Notes:
pgbench executes test scripts chosen randomly from a specified list.
They include built-in scripts with -b and user-provided custom scripts
with -f.
[...]--
Fabien.
--
-
robins