Why is box <-> point missing, and box <-> box not indexable?
point <-> point, circle <-> point and polygon <-> point all exist as
orderable-by-operator operators (in fact they are the only ones by
default). But there's no box <-> point operator at all, and no index
support for box <-> box.
Was this intentional, or just a strange oversight?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
point <-> point, circle <-> point and polygon <-> point all exist as
orderable-by-operator operators (in fact they are the only ones by
default). But there's no box <-> point operator at all, and no index
support for box <-> box.
Was this intentional, or just a strange oversight?
Seems like an oversight. None of these operators have commutators,
but it seems like they all should:
<->(point,line)
<->(point,lseg)
<->(point,box)
<->(lseg,line)
<->(lseg,box)
<->(point,path)
<->(circle,polygon)
<->(line,box)
Dunno about the index-support angle.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers