Nested loop join condition does not get pushed down to foreign scan

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:

I just noticed something surprising:

-- create a larger local table
CREATE TABLE llarge (id integer NOT NULL, val integer NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO llarge SELECT i, i%100 FROM generate_series(1, 10000) i;
ALTER TABLE llarge ADD PRIMARY KEY (id);

-- create a small local table
CREATE TABLE small (id integer PRIMARY KEY, val text NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO small VALUES (1, 'one');

-- create a foreign table based on llarge
CREATE EXTENSION postgres_fdw;
CREATE SERVER loopback FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER postgres_fdw OPTIONS (host 'localhost', port '5432', dbname 'test');
CREATE USER MAPPING FOR myself SERVER loopback OPTIONS (user 'myself', password 'mypassword');
CREATE FOREIGN TABLE rlarge (id integer NOT NULL, val integer NOT NULL) SERVER loopback OPTIONS (table_name 'llarge');

SET enable_hashjoin = off;
-- plan for a nested loop join with a local table
EXPLAIN (COSTS off) SELECT * FROM small JOIN llarge USING (id);
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------
Nested Loop
-> Seq Scan on small
-> Index Scan using llarge_pkey on llarge
Index Cond: (id = small.id)
(4 rows)

-- plan for a nested loop join with a foreign table
EXPLAIN (COSTS off) SELECT * FROM small JOIN rlarge USING (id);
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------
Nested Loop
Join Filter: (small.id = rlarge.id)
-> Seq Scan on small
-> Foreign Scan on rlarge
(4 rows)

Is there a fundamental reason why the join condition does not get pushed down into
the foreign scan or is that an omission that can easily be fixed?

While creating the foreign table, if you specify use_remote_estimate =
true for the table OR do so for the foreign server, postgres_fdw
creates parameterized paths for that foreign relation. If using a
parameterized path reduces cost of the join, it will use a nested loop
join with inner relation parameterized by the outer relation, pushing
join conditions down into the foreign scan.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers