"may be unused" warnings for gcc

Started by Andres Freundabout 9 years ago5 messageshackers
Jump to latest
#1Andres Freund
andres@anarazel.de

Hi,

When building with a new-ish gcc (6.3.0 right now, but I've seen this
for a while) with optimization I get a number of warnings:

In file included from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/postgres.h:48:0,
from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/parser/parse_collate.c:41:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/parser/parse_collate.c: In function ‘select_common_collation’:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/utils/elog.h:107:4: warning: ‘context.location2’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
errfinish rest; \
^~~~~~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/parser/parse_collate.c:210:28: note: ‘context.location2’ was declared here
assign_collations_context context;
^~~~~~~
In file included from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/postgres.h:48:0,
from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/parser/parse_collate.c:41:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/utils/elog.h:107:4: warning: ‘context.collation2’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
errfinish rest; \
^~~~~~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/parser/parse_collate.c:210:28: note: ‘context.collation2’ was declared here
assign_collations_context context;
^~~~~~~

While I believe these are false positives, I am not surprised that the
compiler can't see that. select_common_collation() initializes some
fields of assign_collations_context, but not others. There's several
branches out of assign_collations_walker that return without setting
ocllation2/location2. I think that's currently harmless because
it looks like select_common_collation() won't enter the context.strength
== COLLATE_CONFLICT branch in that case - but it's certainly hard to
see.

In file included from /home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/commands/dbcommands.c:20:0:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/commands/dbcommands.c: In function ‘createdb’:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/include/postgres.h:529:35: warning: ‘src_minmxid’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define TransactionIdGetDatum(X) ((Datum) SET_4_BYTES((X)))
^
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/commands/dbcommands.c:113:14: note: ‘src_minmxid’ was declared here
MultiXactId src_minmxid;
^~~~~~~~~~~
(and the same for src_frozenxid, src_lastsysoid, ...)

It appears that the loop in get_db_info() is too complex for gcc.
Replacing the !HeapTupleIsValid(tuple) break; with a heap_close() and
direct return fixes those.

/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c: In function ‘RestoreGUCState’:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c:6619:21: warning: ‘varsourceline’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
record->sourceline = sourceline;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c:9279:8: note: ‘varsourceline’ was declared here
int varsourceline;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not sure what the problem is here - even if the varsourcefile[0] test in
RestoreGUCState is stored in a local variable that's also checked before
the set_config_sourcefile() branch, it warns. Initializing
varsourceline to 0 works and seems reasonable.

/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c: In function ‘text_position’:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1358:36: warning: ‘state.skiptablemask’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
hptr += state->skiptable[*hptr & skiptablemask];
~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1099:20: note: ‘state.skiptablemask’ was declared here
TextPositionState state;
^~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1344:9: warning: ‘state.wstr2’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (nptr == needle)
^
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1099:20: note: ‘state.wstr2’ was declared here
TextPositionState state;
^~~~~
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1099:20: warning: ‘state.wstr1’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1288:9: warning: ‘state.str2’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (nptr == needle)
^
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/utils/adt/varlena.c:1099:20: note: ‘state.str2’ was declared here
TextPositionState state;
^~~~~

No idea what exactly triggers this, but zero-initializing
TextPositionState helps. What confuses me is that doing so in
text_position() is sufficient - the other uses don't trigger a warning?

/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c: In function ‘shm_mq_receive’:
/home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c:705:3: warning: ‘rawdata’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
memcpy(&mqh->mqh_buffer[mqh->mqh_partial_bytes], rawdata, rb);

That one I'm not surprised about at all - pretty hard to figure out that
rawdata has to be set at that point.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#2Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Andres Freund (#1)
Re: "may be unused" warnings for gcc

On 2/20/17 09:41, Andres Freund wrote:

When building with a new-ish gcc (6.3.0 right now, but I've seen this
for a while) with optimization I get a number of warnings:

These all look like related to inlining/-O3.

I have attempted to fix these in the past, but I have found that -O3
doesn't get any performance improvement, so I haven't bothered lately.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#3Andres Freund
andres@anarazel.de
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#2)
Re: "may be unused" warnings for gcc

On 2017-02-21 17:20:44 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

On 2/20/17 09:41, Andres Freund wrote:

When building with a new-ish gcc (6.3.0 right now, but I've seen this
for a while) with optimization I get a number of warnings:

These all look like related to inlining/-O3.

I have attempted to fix these in the past, but I have found that -O3
doesn't get any performance improvement, so I haven't bothered lately.

I've not run comparisons this year, but late last year I was seeing > 5%
< 10% benefits - that seems plenty enough to care.

- Andres

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

#4Peter Eisentraut
peter_e@gmx.net
In reply to: Andres Freund (#3)
Re: "may be unused" warnings for gcc

On 2/21/17 22:17, Andres Freund wrote:

I've not run comparisons this year, but late last year I was seeing > 5%
< 10% benefits - that seems plenty enough to care.

You mean the 5-minute benchmarks on my laptop are not representative? ;-)

Here is a patch that I had lying around that clears the compiler
warnings under -O3 for me. It seems that they are a subset of what you
are seeing. Plausibly, as compilers are doing more analysis in larger
scopes, we can expect to see more of these.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachments:

0001-Silence-compiler-warnings-from-gcc-O3.patchtext/x-patch; name=0001-Silence-compiler-warnings-from-gcc-O3.patchDownload+14-8
#5Andres Freund
andres@anarazel.de
In reply to: Peter Eisentraut (#4)
Re: [HACKERS] "may be unused" warnings for gcc

Hi,

On 2017-02-22 09:26:10 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

On 2/21/17 22:17, Andres Freund wrote:

I've not run comparisons this year, but late last year I was seeing > 5%
< 10% benefits - that seems plenty enough to care.

You mean the 5-minute benchmarks on my laptop are not representative? ;-)

Here is a patch that I had lying around that clears the compiler
warnings under -O3 for me. It seems that they are a subset of what you
are seeing. Plausibly, as compilers are doing more analysis in larger
scopes, we can expect to see more of these.

I pushed the subset that I still see locally with gcc -O3.

Greetings,

Andres Freund