syscache entries out of order
Peter,
Just FYI, as of 665d1fad99e7b11678b0d5fa24d2898424243cd6, syscache.h
entries are not in alphabetical order, which violates the coding standard
specified in the comment for these entries. In particular, it is the PUBLICATION
and SUBSCRIPTION entries that are mis-ordered.
Sorry for my pedantry. Patch attached.
Mark Dilger
Attachments:
syscache.patch.0application/octet-stream; name=syscache.patch.0Download+60-60
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> writes:
Just FYI, as of 665d1fad99e7b11678b0d5fa24d2898424243cd6, syscache.h
entries are not in alphabetical order, which violates the coding standard
specified in the comment for these entries. In particular, it is the PUBLICATION
and SUBSCRIPTION entries that are mis-ordered.
Agreed, this is the project convention and we should follow it.
Sorry for my pedantry. Patch attached.
Patch pushed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers