Logical replication message type 'Y' is missing in docs
Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.
You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:
docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t37241psql -h localhost -U postgresBuilt from patchset v1 (message #1), July 28, 2026 at 05:35 AM.
Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:
git clone --branch t37241_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.gitIn a checkout you already have, add the fork once:
git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.gitthen, for this patchset and every later one:
git fetch hackorum t37241_1 && git checkout t37241_1Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t37241_1
Hi,
There is a type of logical replication message 'Y' for data types, but
it's not documented in section 52.9. Logical Replication Message
Formats. Attached patch fixes this. I think it can be PG10 item.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
On 8/9/17 20:22, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
There is a type of logical replication message 'Y' for data types, but
it's not documented in section 52.9. Logical Replication Message
Formats. Attached patch fixes this. I think it can be PG10 item.
Committed with some tweaking.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:38 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
On 8/9/17 20:22, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
There is a type of logical replication message 'Y' for data types, but
it's not documented in section 52.9. Logical Replication Message
Formats. Attached patch fixes this. I think it can be PG10 item.Committed with some tweaking.
Thank you!
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers