stats_ext test fails with -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE
Hi.
While playing around with a -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE build, I noticed that
stats_ext test failed with errors for multiple statements that looked like
this:
ERROR: invalid ndistinct magic 7f7f7f7f (expected a352bfa4)
I figured it's because statext_dependencies_load() and
statext_ndistinct_build() both return a pointer that points directly into
a pg_statistics_ext tuple obtained by using SearchSysCache1 that has
uncertain lifetime after subsequent call to ReleaseSysCache before returning.
I think we should be calling statext_dependencies_deserialize() and
statext_ndistinct_deserialize(), respectively, *before* we perform
ReleaseSysCache on the tuple. Attached patch does that.
Thanks,
Amit
Attachments:
extended-stat-catalog-datum-1.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=extended-stat-catalog-datum-1.patchDownload+8-2
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
While playing around with a -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE build, I noticed that
stats_ext test failed with errors for multiple statements that looked like
this:
ERROR: invalid ndistinct magic 7f7f7f7f (expected a352bfa4)
Interesting. How come the buildfarm hasn't noticed this? I should
think that the CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals, as well as the one(s)
using -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, would have shown failures.
regards, tom lane
On 2018/05/02 0:33, Tom Lane wrote:
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
While playing around with a -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE build, I noticed that
stats_ext test failed with errors for multiple statements that looked like
this:
ERROR: invalid ndistinct magic 7f7f7f7f (expected a352bfa4)Interesting. How come the buildfarm hasn't noticed this? I should
think that the CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals, as well as the one(s)
using -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, would have shown failures.
I too wondered why. Fwiw, similar failure occurs in PG 10 branch.
Thanks,
Amit
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
On 2018/05/02 0:33, Tom Lane wrote:
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
While playing around with a -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE build, I noticed that
stats_ext test failed with errors for multiple statements that looked like
this:
ERROR: invalid ndistinct magic 7f7f7f7f (expected a352bfa4)
Interesting. How come the buildfarm hasn't noticed this? I should
think that the CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS animals, as well as the one(s)
using -DCATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE, would have shown failures.
I too wondered why. Fwiw, similar failure occurs in PG 10 branch.
Ah, after looking closer I understand that. First, there isn't any
buildfarm member using CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE --- what I was thinking
of is Andrew's prion, which uses RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE. Not the
same thing.
Second, the nature of the bug is that these functions are reading
from a catcache entry immediately after ReleaseSysCache, when they
should do that immediately before. CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS does not
trigger the problem because it clobbers cache only at invalidation
opportunities. In the current implementation, ReleaseSysCache per
se is not an invalidation opportunity.
CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE does model a real-world hazard, which is
that if we get an invalidation signal for a catcache item *while
it's pinned*, it'd go away as soon as the last pin is released.
Evidently, these code paths do not contain any invalidation
opportunities occurring while the pin on the stats_ext catcache
entry is already held, so CCA can't trigger the problem. I think
this means that there's no production hazard here, just a violation
of coding convention. Nonetheless, we certainly should fix it,
since it's easy to imagine future changes that would create a live
hazard of the tuple going away during the ReleaseSysCache call.
tl;dr: we lack buildfarm coverage of CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
This is probably bad. It might be okay to just add that to
prion's configuration; I'm not sure whether there's any value
in testing it separately from RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
regards, tom lane
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
tl;dr: we lack buildfarm coverage of CATCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
This is probably bad. It might be okay to just add that to
prion's configuration;
Will do that pronto.
cheers
andre
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services