psql show URL with help
As mentioned on
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/looking-at-mysql-8-with-postgresql-goggles-on/
how about this:
=> \h analyze
Command: ANALYZE
Description: collect statistics about a database
Syntax:
ANALYZE [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
ANALYZE [ VERBOSE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
where option can be one of:
VERBOSE
SKIP_LOCKED
and table_and_columns is:
table_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ]
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^
(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
čt 21. 2. 2019 v 18:28 odesílatel Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
As mentioned on
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/looking-at-mysql-8-with-postgresql-goggles-on/
how about this:
=> \h analyze
Command: ANALYZE
Description: collect statistics about a database
Syntax:
ANALYZE [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
ANALYZE [ VERBOSE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]where option can be one of:
VERBOSE
SKIP_LOCKEDand table_and_columns is:
table_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ]
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)
Why not? It can be useful
Pavel
Show quoted text
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:33 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
čt 21. 2. 2019 v 18:28 odesílatel Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
As mentioned on
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/looking-at-mysql-8-with-postgresql-goggles-on/
how about this:
=> \h analyze
Command: ANALYZE
Description: collect statistics about a database
Syntax:
ANALYZE [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
ANALYZE [ VERBOSE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]where option can be one of:
VERBOSE
SKIP_LOCKEDand table_and_columns is:
table_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ]
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)Why not? It can be useful
Or just use the devel version for not-released-yet versions?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:28:09PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
As mentioned on
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/looking-at-mysql-8-with-postgresql-goggles-on/
how about this:
=> \h analyze
Command: ANALYZE
Description: collect statistics about a database
Syntax:
ANALYZE [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
ANALYZE [ VERBOSE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]where option can be one of:
VERBOSE
SKIP_LOCKEDand table_and_columns is:
table_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ]
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)
Since there's no longer any mystery as to what the upcoming major
version of PostgreSQL will be, it should be pretty straightforward to
redirect integers > max(released version) to the devel docs.
This could cause some confusion because we branch long (feature- and
bug-wise) before we do the release, and a checkout from immediately
after branching will be *very* different from one just before the
release. The way I've come up with to clear this up is *way* too
expensive: lazily create doc builds for each SHA1 requested. Pointing
people at the latest devel docs is less confusing than pointing them
at nothing or at the previous version, those being, as far as I can
tell, the viable alternatives.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:28 PM Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
As mentioned on
https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com/en/looking-at-mysql-8-with-postgresql-goggles-on/
how about this:
=> \h analyze
Command: ANALYZE
Description: collect statistics about a database
Syntax:
ANALYZE [ ( option [, ...] ) ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]
ANALYZE [ VERBOSE ] [ table_and_columns [, ...] ]where option can be one of:
VERBOSE
SKIP_LOCKEDand table_and_columns is:
table_name [ ( column_name [, ...] ) ]
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^
I've had doing this on my TODO for a few years, but never managed to get
around to it. So strong +1 for the idea :)
(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)
Why not just link to /devel/ when it's a devel version? The 12 docs will be
up alongside the first beta version, so it should be perfectly possible to
have it do that based on information from configure, no?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
Em qui, 21 de fev de 2019 às 14:28, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^
What happen if I connect to an old server? Did it print URL according
to psql version or server version? psql prints help about its version
and if user wants details about a command, clicks in the URL but what
is shown is 12 docs but user is accessing a 9.4 server. Ops... the
command failed. Check the URL again but... wait it is not 9.4 docs.
There is also the case that some commands don't exist on old versions
but URL will be printed. IMHO URL should be printed iif psql version
is the same as server version. If we want flexibility, let's add an
option to enable URL exhibition (always/same) that defaults to same.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
On 2019-02-22 15:37, Euler Taveira wrote:
Em qui, 21 de fev de 2019 às 14:28, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^What happen if I connect to an old server? Did it print URL according
to psql version or server version? psql prints help about its version
and if user wants details about a command, clicks in the URL but what
is shown is 12 docs but user is accessing a 9.4 server. Ops... the
command failed. Check the URL again but... wait it is not 9.4 docs.
Well, the help that currently displays is also hardcoded to the psql
version. At least this way it would indicate in the URL that it might
pertain to a different version.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes:
Em qui, 21 de fev de 2019 às 14:28, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> escreveu:
What happen if I connect to an old server? Did it print URL according
to psql version or server version? psql prints help about its version
and if user wants details about a command, clicks in the URL but what
is shown is 12 docs but user is accessing a 9.4 server.
The syntax summary that psql is showing is for its own version, and
I'd say the URL must be too. You can't even be sure that a corresponding
URL would exist in another version, so blindly inserting the server's
major version into a URL string that psql has doesn't seem like a bright
idea.
(I'm assuming that the implementation Peter has in mind is that these
URLs would just be part of the prefab help text that psql has for
various commands. If we somehow involved the server in it, then
maybe things could be different; but I doubt that's possible without
a protocol change, which it's probably not worth.)
In the end, if you are using a server version that's different from
your psql version, there are lots of ways things could go wrong.
I think it's up to the user to take psql's help with a grain of salt
in such cases.
regards, tom lane
Em sex, 22 de fev de 2019 às 11:55, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
The syntax summary that psql is showing is for its own version, and
I'd say the URL must be too. You can't even be sure that a corresponding
URL would exist in another version, so blindly inserting the server's
major version into a URL string that psql has doesn't seem like a bright
idea.
I'm not suggesting that we replace version number using the latest
version URL. However, we could prevent URL to be shown if the version
mismatch. If psql wasn't backward compatible we shouldn't care but it
is. Someone could be confused as I said earlier.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br> writes:
I'm not suggesting that we replace version number using the latest
version URL. However, we could prevent URL to be shown if the version
mismatch. If psql wasn't backward compatible we shouldn't care but it
is. Someone could be confused as I said earlier.
I tend to agree with Peter that showing the URL is actually better
than not doing so, in such a case --- it might remind the user
which version the help text is for.
regards, tom lane
On 2019-02-21 18:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
=> \h analyze
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^
Here is a patch.
It doesn't deal with the "devel" paths yet. Discussion there is still
ongoing a bit.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachments:
v1-0001-psql-Add-URL-to-help-output.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=v1-0001-psql-Add-URL-to-help-output.patch; x-mac-creator=0; x-mac-type=0Download+13-5
On 2019-02-22 12:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)Why not just link to /devel/ when it's a devel version? The 12 docs will
be up alongside the first beta version, so it should be perfectly
possible to have it do that based on information from configure, no?
Why not just serve /12/ from the web site earlier? Is there a reason
not to?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
po 25. 2. 2019 v 12:06 odesílatel Peter Eisentraut <
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> napsal:
On 2019-02-22 12:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
(Won't actually work because the web site isn't serving "12" URLs
yet,
but that's something that could probably be sorted out.)
Why not just link to /devel/ when it's a devel version? The 12 docs will
be up alongside the first beta version, so it should be perfectly
possible to have it do that based on information from configure, no?Why not just serve /12/ from the web site earlier? Is there a reason
not to?
I had same idea. The fact so this version is development version, can be
solved by some styles.
But a URL should be stable.
Regards
Pavel
Show quoted text
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On 2019-02-25 12:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 2019-02-21 18:28, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
=> \h analyze
URL: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/sql-analyze.html
^^^^Here is a patch.
It doesn't deal with the "devel" paths yet. Discussion there is still
ongoing a bit.
A new patch that now handles the "devel" part. Seems easy enough.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachments:
v2-0001-psql-Add-documentation-URL-to-help-output.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=v2-0001-psql-Add-documentation-URL-to-help-output.patch; x-mac-creator=0; x-mac-type=0Download+17-5
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
+ url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html", + strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") ? "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION, + QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
Do we need to make sure that the docs are published under the major
version as soon as we get to alpha, or do we need something more like
this?
url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
(strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") || strstr(PG_VERSION, "beta") ||
strstr(PG_VERSION, "alpha")) : "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Hi,
Is there any documentation change required for this patch?
Cheers
Ram 4.0
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:14 PM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
+ url = psprintf("
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
+
strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") ? "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
+
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
Do we need to make sure that the docs are published under the major
version as soon as we get to alpha, or do we need something more like
this?url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
(strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") || strstr(PG_VERSION, "beta") ||
strstr(PG_VERSION, "alpha")) : "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
We don't really release alphas any more. And we do load the documentation
alongside the betas. (Last time we did an alpha was so long ago I don't
remember if we loaded docs)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 09:57:25PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:14 PM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
+ url = psprintf("
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
+
strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") ? "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
+
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
Do we need to make sure that the docs are published under the major
version as soon as we get to alpha, or do we need something more like
this?url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
(strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") || strstr(PG_VERSION, "beta") ||
strstr(PG_VERSION, "alpha")) : "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);We don't really release alphas any more. And we do load the documentation
alongside the betas. (Last time we did an alpha was so long ago I don't
remember if we loaded docs)
If the first thing we do when we move from devel to some other state
(beta, RC, etc.) is to publish the docs under the major version
number, then maybe this test should be more along the lines of looking
for anything that's neither devel nor a number, extract the number,
and use that.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 10:48 PM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2019 at 09:57:25PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:14 PM David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:14:59AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
+ url = psprintf("
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
+
strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") ? "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
+
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);
Do we need to make sure that the docs are published under the major
version as soon as we get to alpha, or do we need something more like
this?url = psprintf("https://www.postgresql.org/docs/%s/%s.html",
(strstr(PG_VERSION, "devel") || strstr(PG_VERSION, "beta")||
strstr(PG_VERSION, "alpha")) : "devel" : PG_MAJORVERSION,
QL_HELP[i].docbook_id);We don't really release alphas any more. And we do load the documentation
alongside the betas. (Last time we did an alpha was so long ago I don't
remember if we loaded docs)If the first thing we do when we move from devel to some other state
(beta, RC, etc.) is to publish the docs under the major version
number, then maybe this test should be more along the lines of looking
for anything that's neither devel nor a number, extract the number,
and use that.
Well, alpha versions do go under the numeric URL. Whether we load the docs
at that time or not we can just choose -- but there is no reason not to. So
yeah, that sounds like it would work better.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
On 2019-03-04 17:55, Magnus Hagander wrote:
If the first thing we do when we move from devel to some other state
(beta, RC, etc.) is to publish the docs under the major version
number, then maybe this test should be more along the lines of looking
for anything that's neither devel nor a number, extract the number,
and use that.Well, alpha versions do go under the numeric URL. Whether we load the
docs at that time or not we can just choose -- but there is no reason
not to. So yeah, that sounds like it would work better.
Can you put your proposal in the form of some logical pseudocode? I
don't understand the free-form description.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services