GRAM.Y help..............
Can anyone help me remove the shift/reduce conflicts from the syntax? It
works perfectly, but since you guys won't accept shift/reduce
conflicts....
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [HACKERS] gram.y help, ONLY syntax
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:13:00 +1000
From: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
I've made changes to gram.y to reduce the conflicts down to a couple of
harmless shift/reduce conflicts, but I don't seem to have the right
black-magic incantations to remove these last ones. They seem to be
related to ONLY syntax. Can anybody help?
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/gram.y.gz
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/y.output.gz
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz
Hi,
does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a
TokenId, this would lead to ONLY not being a ColId and by that
removing all unresolvable conflicts in the grammar? This patch
against your gram.y does this. I have tested it with bison 1.27,
and verified that the conflicts are gone, but I have not tested
it for correct behavior in postgres. I did not have the time to
understand the whole grammar so I might have missed something
obvious.
Regards,
Fredrik Estreen
Chris Bitmead wrote:
Show quoted text
Can anyone help me remove the shift/reduce conflicts from the syntax? It
works perfectly, but since you guys won't accept shift/reduce
conflicts....-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [HACKERS] gram.y help, ONLY syntax
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:13:00 +1000
From: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>I've made changes to gram.y to reduce the conflicts down to a couple of
harmless shift/reduce conflicts, but I don't seem to have the right
black-magic incantations to remove these last ones. They seem to be
related to ONLY syntax. Can anybody help?ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/gram.y.gz
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/y.output.gz
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz
Attachments:
gram-only.difftext/plain; charset=us-ascii; name=gram-only.diffDownload+1-1
Fredrik Estreen wrote:
does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a
TokenId,
You're a genius!
I'm re-submitting this OO patch... Did the 7.1 tree start yet?
ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz
--
Chris Bitmead
mailto:chris@bitmead.com
Fredrik Estreen wrote:
does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a
TokenId,You're a genius!
I'm re-submitting this OO patch... Did the 7.1 tree start yet?
Yes.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026