Minor fix in reloptions.c comments
Hi,
I found some minor grammar mistake while reading reloptions.c code comments.
Attached is the fix.
I just changed "affect" to "effect", for both n_distinct and vacuum_truncate.
- * values has no affect until the ...
+ * values has no effect until the ...
Regards,
Kirk Jamison
Attachments:
reloptions-comment-fix.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=reloptions-comment-fix.patchDownload+2-2
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 02:41:37AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote:
I found some minor grammar mistake while reading reloptions.c code comments.
Attached is the fix.
I just changed "affect" to "effect", for both n_distinct and vacuum_truncate.
- * values has no affect until the ...
+ * values has no effect until the ...
A lot of those parameter updates affect processing and still they have
many side effects, as per those paragraphs.
Fixed, thanks!
--
Michael
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:01 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 02:41:37AM +0000, Jamison, Kirk wrote:
I found some minor grammar mistake while reading reloptions.c code comments.
Attached is the fix.
I just changed "affect" to "effect", for both n_distinct and vacuum_truncate.
- * values has no affect until the ...
+ * values has no effect until the ...A lot of those parameter updates affect processing and still they have
many side effects, as per those paragraphs.
Well, "has no affect" is clearly wrong here, and Kirk's fix is clearly
right. I don't know what your point here is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company