[Fwd: PostgreSQL RPMS...]

No idea. I just brand the files.

I thought Bruce fixed this.....
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: PostgreSQL RPMS...
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 14:27 -0600 (MDT)
From: Ronald Patterson <Ron.Patterson@wcom.com>
Organization: MCI WorlsCom
To: lamar.owen@wgcr.org

Hi Lamar,

I assume that you may still be doing the RPMS's for PostgreSQL.
Just a note on the latest 7.0.2-1 RPMS release. The binaries from
the RPMS are reporting that they are version 7.0.1, instead of
7.0.2 for the release. Not major and does not appear to effect
the running but it is just a nit.

Currently running these on a Linux-Mandrake 7.0.

Thanks for the support,
Ron
===============================================================
Ron Patterson | MCI WorldCom (warehouseMCI)
Ron.Patterson@wcom.com | 5775 Mark Dabling Blvd.
AOL/IM: RonPDude | Dept. 1350/786
719-535-5727 | Colorado Springs, CO 80919
Fax: 719-535-6164 |

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Bruce Momjian wrote:

No idea. I just brand the files.

----

I assume that you may still be doing the RPMS's for PostgreSQL.
Just a note on the latest 7.0.2-1 RPMS release. The binaries from
the RPMS are reporting that they are version 7.0.1, instead of

If I run psql -V on 7.0.2, it reports that it is 7.0.1.

Oh well.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

Bruce Momjian wrote:

No idea. I just brand the files.

----

I assume that you may still be doing the RPMS's for PostgreSQL.
Just a note on the latest 7.0.2-1 RPMS release. The binaries from
the RPMS are reporting that they are version 7.0.1, instead of

If I run psql -V on 7.0.2, it reports that it is 7.0.1.

Oh well.

Strange. If you look in include/version.h.in, it constructs
PG_VERSION_STR and I see 7.0.2 in there. My guess is that somehow the
tarball being grabbed has 7.0.1 in include/version.h.in, even though CVS
has 7.0.2.

Can you check on that?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

Bruce Momjian wrote:

Bruce Momjian wrote:

No idea. I just brand the files.

----

I assume that you may still be doing the RPMS's for PostgreSQL.
Just a note on the latest 7.0.2-1 RPMS release. The binaries from
the RPMS are reporting that they are version 7.0.1, instead of

If I run psql -V on 7.0.2, it reports that it is 7.0.1.

Oh well.

Strange. If you look in include/version.h.in, it constructs
PG_VERSION_STR and I see 7.0.2 in there. My guess is that somehow the
tarball being grabbed has 7.0.1 in include/version.h.in, even though CVS
has 7.0.2.

Can you check on that?

The tarball I had (which was the one Marc was _going_ to release) had
7.0.1; the current 7.0.2 tarball has 7.0.2. I'll fix the RPM's with the
right tarball -- although, I built them _after_ the announcement. Oh
well. Time for a 7.0.2-2, I guess.

So, the currently available tarball has the right string; the one I have
been distributing in the RPM's thinks its 7.0.1, except for the
packaging (which was the only real change in 7.0.2....:-))...

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11