enhance SPI to support EXECUTE commands
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;
In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements
dynamically.
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
Attachments:
spi_execmd.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=spi_execmd.patch; x-mac-creator=0; x-mac-type=0Download
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/spi.c b/src/backend/executor/spi.c
index 22dd55c378..b364492e0e 100644
--- a/src/backend/executor/spi.c
+++ b/src/backend/executor/spi.c
@@ -2272,6 +2272,27 @@ _SPI_execute_plan(SPIPlanPtr plan, ParamListInfo paramLI,
_SPI_current->processed = pg_strtouint64(completionTag + 5,
NULL, 10);
}
+ else if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, ExecuteStmt))
+ {
+ if (strncmp(completionTag, "INSERT ", 7) == 0)
+ {
+ char *p = completionTag + 7;
+ /* INSERT: skip oid and space */
+ while (*p && *p != ' ')
+ p++;
+ if (*p != 0)
+ {
+ _SPI_current->processed =
+ pg_strtouint64(p, NULL, 10);
+ }
+ }
+ else if (strncmp(completionTag, "UPDATE ", 7) == 0 ||
+ strncmp(completionTag, "DELETE ", 7) == 0)
+ {
+ _SPI_current->processed =
+ pg_strtouint64(completionTag + 7, NULL, 10);
+ }
+ }
}
/*
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang <
zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com> napsal:
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements
dynamically.
Is there some use case for support this feature?
Regards
Pavel
Show quoted text
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements
dynamically.Is there some use case for support this feature?
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method, hoping to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, and found that
each time will get 0.
Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do something
Here j is always equal to 0.
Regards
Show quoted text
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:25 odesílatel Quan Zongliang <
zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com> napsal:
On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support getting
result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETEstatements
dynamically.
Is there some use case for support this feature?
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method, hoping to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, and found that
each time will get 0.Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;
This has not sense in plpgsql. Why you use PREPARE statement explicitly?
Show quoted text
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do somethingHere j is always equal to 0.
Regards
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
On 2019/9/5 16:31, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:25 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>> napsal:
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support
getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support
for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statements
dynamically.
Is there some use case for support this feature?
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method, hoping
to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, and found
that
each time will get 0.Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;This has not sense in plpgsql. Why you use PREPARE statement explicitly?
Yes, I told him to do it in other ways, and the problem has been solved.
Under psql, we can get this result
flying=# EXECUTE smt_del(100);
DELETE 1
So I think this may be the negligence of SPI, it should be better to
deal with it.
Show quoted text
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do somethingHere j is always equal to 0.
Regards
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:57 odesílatel Quan Zongliang <
zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com> napsal:
On 2019/9/5 16:31, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:25 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>> napsal:
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support
getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support
for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statements
dynamically.
Is there some use case for support this feature?
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method, hoping
to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, and found
that
each time will get 0.Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;This has not sense in plpgsql. Why you use PREPARE statement explicitly?
Yes, I told him to do it in other ways, and the problem has been solved.
Under psql, we can get this result
flying=# EXECUTE smt_del(100);
DELETE 1So I think this may be the negligence of SPI, it should be better to
deal with it.
Personally, I would not to support features that allows bad code.
Pavel
Show quoted text
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do somethingHere j is always equal to 0.
Regards
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
On 2019/9/5 17:33, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:57 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:On 2019/9/5 16:31, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:25 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>> napsal:
On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
> <zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>
> <mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>>> napsal:
>
> Dear hackers,
>
> I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
>
> PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
> EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
> GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;
>
> In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support
getting result
> of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement.Support
for the
> number of rows processed when executingINSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statements
> dynamically.
>
>
> Is there some use case for support this feature?
>
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method,hoping
to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, andfound
that
each time will get 0.Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;This has not sense in plpgsql. Why you use PREPARE statement
explicitly?
Yes, I told him to do it in other ways, and the problem has been solved.
Under psql, we can get this result
flying=# EXECUTE smt_del(100);
DELETE 1So I think this may be the negligence of SPI, it should be better to
deal with it.Personally, I would not to support features that allows bad code.
My code is actually a way to continue the CREATE AS SELECT and COPY
statements. In spi.c, they look like this:
if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, CreateTableAsStmt)) // original code
...
else if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, CopyStmt)) // original code
...
else if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, ExecuteStmt)) // my code
My patch was not developed for this PL/pgSQL approach. I just because it
found this problem.
Show quoted text
Pavel
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do somethingHere j is always equal to 0.
Regards
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
> Regards,
> Quan Zongliang
>
pá 6. 9. 2019 v 3:36 odesílatel Quan Zongliang <
zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com> napsal:
On 2019/9/5 17:33, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:57 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>> napsal:On 2019/9/5 16:31, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 10:25 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>> napsal:
On 2019/9/5 15:09, Pavel Stehule wrote:
čt 5. 9. 2019 v 8:39 odesílatel Quan Zongliang
<zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com
<mailto:zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com>>>> napsal:
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not
support
getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement.
Support
for the
number of rows processed when executing
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE
statements
dynamically.
Is there some use case for support this feature?
A user deletes the data in PL/pgSQL using the above method,
hoping
to do
more processing according to the number of rows affected, andfound
that
each time will get 0.Sample code:
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1 WHERE c=$1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;This has not sense in plpgsql. Why you use PREPARE statement
explicitly?
Yes, I told him to do it in other ways, and the problem has been
solved.
Under psql, we can get this result
flying=# EXECUTE smt_del(100);
DELETE 1So I think this may be the negligence of SPI, it should be better to
deal with it.Personally, I would not to support features that allows bad code.
My code is actually a way to continue the CREATE AS SELECT and COPY
statements. In spi.c, they look like this:if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, CreateTableAsStmt)) // original code
...
else if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, CopyStmt)) // original code
...
else if (IsA(stmt->utilityStmt, ExecuteStmt)) // my codeMy patch was not developed for this PL/pgSQL approach. I just because it
found this problem.
ok, I can understand to this - but your example is usage is not good.
Pavel
Show quoted text
Pavel
IF j=1 THEN
do something
ELSIF j=0 THEN
do somethingHere j is always equal to 0.
Regards
Regards
Pavel
Regards,
Quan Zongliang
I don't see much use for this because the documentation says that "server's
execute command cannot be used directly within pl/pgsql function (and it is
not needed). Within pl/pgsql you can execute update/delete commands using
pl/pgsql EXECUTE command and get results like row_count using "get
diagnostic".
Why would somebody do what you have shown in your example in pl/pgsql? Or
do you have a more general use-case for this enhancement?
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:39 AM Quan Zongliang <
zongliang.quan@postgresdata.com> wrote:
Dear hackers,
I found that such a statement would get 0 in PL/pgSQL.
PREPARE smt_del(int) AS DELETE FROM t1;
EXECUTE 'EXECUTE smt_del(100)';
GET DIAGNOSTICS j = ROW_COUNT;In fact, this is a problem with SPI, it does not support getting result
of the EXECUTE command. I made a little enhancement. Support for the
number of rows processed when executing INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements
dynamically.Regards,
Quan Zongliang
--
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : http://www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
EMAIL: mailto: ahsan.hadi@highgo.ca
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 05:29:52PM +0500, Ahsan Hadi wrote:
I don't see much use for this because the documentation says that "server's
execute command cannot be used directly within pl/pgsql function (and it is
not needed). Within pl/pgsql you can execute update/delete commands using
pl/pgsql EXECUTE command and get results like row_count using "get
diagnostic".Why would somebody do what you have shown in your example in pl/pgsql? Or
do you have a more general use-case for this enhancement?
Yeah, I think that's a good question - why would we need this? In fact,
the plpgsql docs explicitly say:
The PL/pgSQL EXECUTE statement is not related to the EXECUTE SQL
statement supported by the PostgreSQL server. The server's EXECUTE
statement cannot be used directly within PL/pgSQL functions (and is
not needed).
That is because all queries in plpgsql are prepared and cached
automatically, so why would we need this feature?
In any case, the patch should probably be in "waiting on author" state,
so I'll make it that way.
registrace
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
I've marked this patch as returned with feedback. It's been sitting in
the CF without any response from the author since September, and it's
not quite clear we actually want/need this feature. If needed, the patch
can be resubmitted for 2020-03.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services