Fix a couple of typos in JIT
Hi,
I was just looking over the JIT code and noticed a few comment and
documentation typos. The attached fixes them.
I'll push this in my UTC+12 morning if nobody objects to any of the
changes before then.
Unsure if it'll be worth backpatching or not.
David
Attachments:
fix_a_few_jit_typos.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=fix_a_few_jit_typos.patchDownload+7-8
At 2020-08-20 22:19:49 +1200, dgrowleyml@gmail.com wrote:
I was just looking over the JIT code and noticed a few comment and
documentation typos. The attached fixes them.
The first change does not seem to be correct:
-That this is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases
-where the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT,
-rather than ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used
-in PostgreSQL, the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are
-somewhat blurry.
+This is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases where
+the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT, rather than
+ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used in PostgreSQL,
+the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are somewhat blurry.
The original sentence may not be the most shining example of
sentence-ry, but it is correct, and removing the "That" breaks it.
-- Abhijit
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 22:29, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@toroid.org> wrote:
At 2020-08-20 22:19:49 +1200, dgrowleyml@gmail.com wrote:
I was just looking over the JIT code and noticed a few comment and
documentation typos. The attached fixes them.The first change does not seem to be correct:
-That this is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases -where the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT, -rather than ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used -in PostgreSQL, the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are -somewhat blurry. +This is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases where +the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT, rather than +ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used in PostgreSQL, +the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are somewhat blurry.The original sentence may not be the most shining example of
sentence-ry, but it is correct, and removing the "That" breaks it.
Oh, I see. I missed that. Perhaps it would be better changed to "The
fact that this"
David
At 2020-08-20 22:51:41 +1200, dgrowleyml@gmail.com wrote:
+This is done at query execution time, possibly even only in cases where +the relevant task is done a number of times, makes it JIT, rather than +ahead-of-time (AOT). Given the way JIT compilation is used in PostgreSQL, +the lines between interpretation, AOT and JIT are somewhat blurry. […]Oh, I see. I missed that. Perhaps it would be better changed to "The
fact that this"
Or maybe even:
This is JIT, rather than ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation, because it
is done at query execution time, and perhaps only in cases where the
relevant task is repeated a number of times. Given the way …
-- Abhijit
Hi,
On 2020-08-20 15:59:26 +0530, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
The original sentence may not be the most shining example of
sentence-ry, but it is correct, and removing the "That" breaks it.
That made me laugh ;)
David, sounds good, after adapting to Abhijit's concerns.
Greetings,
Andres Freund