[doc] minor wording improvement in a couple of places
Hi
On these pages:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/fdw-callbacks.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/tablesample-method.html
we have the phrase:
"..., which see for additional details."
which strikes me as a bit odd. Suggested phrasing:
"...; see this file for additional details."
Regards
Ian Barwick
--
Ian Barwick https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Attachments:
doc-see-for-additional-details.patchtext/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name=doc-see-for-additional-details.patchDownload+4-4
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:34 AM Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:
Hi
On these pages:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/fdw-callbacks.html
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/tablesample-method.htmlwe have the phrase:
"..., which see for additional details."
which strikes me as a bit odd. Suggested phrasing:
"...; see this file for additional details."
I agree this sounds very weird. However, this phrasing is also fairly
common in comments around the code.
I was first guessing that this came out of one of us non-english native
speakers, but AFAICT it's a mix of authors and definitely including those
natively speaking the language.
I would still suggest that we change it, because it does sound odd to me as
well, but I'll defer a bit and see if others might think we should keep it.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:30 AM Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 6:34 AM Ian Barwick <ian.barwick@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
"..., which see for additional details."
which strikes me as a bit odd. Suggested phrasing:
"...; see this file for additional details."
I agree this sounds very weird. However, this phrasing is also fairly common in comments around the code.
Seems to be a literal translation of Latin "quod vide" (q.v.), so
intentional, just sounds a bit old fashioned. I'd vote to keep it.
--
John Naylor https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services