a problem about XLogReader callback system

Started by Wang, Shenhaoover 5 years ago2 messages
#1Wang, Shenhao
wangsh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com

Hi, hackers

I have a problem about XLogReader callback system

In xlog.c, function StartupXLOG

xlogreader =
XLogReaderAllocate(wal_segment_size, NULL,
XL_ROUTINE(.page_read = &XLogPageRead,
.segment_open = NULL,
.segment_close = wal_segment_close),
&private);

XLogPageReader uses readFile to store the fd, and I can't find any location to set the value of seg.ws_file.
Is it necessary to set a segment_close callback?

Best regards
Wang

#2Alvaro Herrera
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
In reply to: Wang, Shenhao (#1)
Re: a problem about XLogReader callback system

Hello,

On 2020-Sep-28, Wang, Shenhao wrote:

I have a problem about XLogReader callback system

In xlog.c, function StartupXLOG

xlogreader =
XLogReaderAllocate(wal_segment_size, NULL,
XL_ROUTINE(.page_read = &XLogPageRead,
.segment_open = NULL,
.segment_close = wal_segment_close),
&private);

XLogPageReader uses readFile to store the fd, and I can't find any
location to set the value of seg.ws_file.

Hmm, AFAICS (admittedly a quick look) you're right: because XLogPageRead
does not touch ws_file, wal_segment_close would always find that it's
unset (-1) so XLogReaderFree would have nothing to do.

The whole XLogReader abstraction remains pretty leaky, I'm afraid :-(
Ideally we would plug those holes. Perhaps getting rid of readFile
completely would be a solution, but I haven't analyzed it.

Is it necessary to set a segment_close callback?

For this case it seems useless but not actually harmful. Have you come
across some scenario in which it causes a problem?

--
�lvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services