[PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.

Started by Jimmy Angelakosabout 5 years ago2 messages

jimmy@2ndquadrant.com

about 5 years ago

1 attachment(s)

Hi hackers,

Please find attached my first patch (the tiniest of doc patches) :
I found the wording around convalidated in pg_catalog documentation a bit
confusing/ambiguous.

If I'm doing something wrong, please let me know :)

Best regards,
Jimmy

Jimmy Angelakos
Senior PostgreSQL Architect
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/

Attachments:

v1-0001-Clarify-wording-for-convalidated-in-pg_constraint.patchtext/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name=v1-0001-Clarify-wording-for-convalidated-in-pg_constraint.patchDownload

From dc00ce719cb6cd6d42eac3294fa607fcbb2253b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jimmy Angelakos <jimmy@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 13:33:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.

---
 doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
index 5bd54cb218..0ccdff1cda 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml
@@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable>&lt;iteration count&gt;</replaceable>:<replaceable>&l
       </para>
       <para>
        Has the constraint been validated?
-       Currently, can only be false for foreign keys and CHECK constraints
+       Currently, can be false only for foreign keys and CHECK constraints
       </para></entry>
      </row>
 
-- 
2.25.1

Tom Lane

tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us

about 5 years ago

In reply to: Jimmy Angelakos (#1)

Re: [PATCH] Clarify wording for convalidated in pg_constraint.

Jimmy Angelakos <jimmy@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

Please find attached my first patch (the tiniest of doc patches) :
I found the wording around convalidated in pg_catalog documentation a bit
confusing/ambiguous.

Seems reasonable; pushed.

regards, tom lane