Use macros for calculating LWLock offset
Hi,
In the lwlock.c, InitializeLWLocks() calculate the LWLock offset by
itself (c319991bcad),
however, there are macros defined in lwlock.h, I think, we can use the
macros.
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
index 2fa90cc095..108e652179 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lwlock.c
@@ -525,18 +525,17 @@ InitializeLWLocks(void)
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock, id); /* Initialize buffer mapping LWLocks in main array */
- lock = MainLWLockArray + NUM_INDIVIDUAL_LWLOCKS;
+ lock = MainLWLockArray + BUFFER_MAPPING_LWLOCK_OFFSET;
for (id = 0; id < NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS; id++, lock++)
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock, LWTRANCHE_BUFFER_MAPPING); /* Initialize lmgrs' LWLocks in main array */
- lock = MainLWLockArray + NUM_INDIVIDUAL_LWLOCKS +
NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS;
+ lock = MainLWLockArray + LOCK_MANAGER_LWLOCK_OFFSET;
for (id = 0; id < NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS; id++, lock++)
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock, LWTRANCHE_LOCK_MANAGER); /* Initialize predicate lmgrs' LWLocks in main array */
- lock = MainLWLockArray + NUM_INDIVIDUAL_LWLOCKS +
- NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS + NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS;
+ lock = MainLWLockArray + PREDICATELOCK_MANAGER_LWLOCK_OFFSET;
for (id = 0; id < NUM_PREDICATELOCK_PARTITIONS; id++, lock++)
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock,
LWTRANCHE_PREDICATE_LOCK_MANAGER);--
Best regards
Japin Li
Attachments:
lwlock-offset.patchtext/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name=lwlock-offset.patchDownload+3-4
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 03:39:51PM +0800, japin wrote:
In the lwlock.c, InitializeLWLocks() calculate the LWLock offset by itself
(c319991bcad),
however, there are macros defined in lwlock.h, I think, we can use the
macros.
I agree that this makes this code a bit cleaner, so let's use those
macros. Others may have some comments here, so let's wait a bit
first.
--
Michael
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:25:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I agree that this makes this code a bit cleaner, so let's use those
macros. Others may have some comments here, so let's wait a bit
first.
Got this one committed as of d03d754.
--
Michael
Thanks!
On Nov 24, 2020, at 11:51 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz<mailto:michael@paquier.xyz>> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 03:25:50PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
I agree that this makes this code a bit cleaner, so let's use those
macros. Others may have some comments here, so let's wait a bit
first.
Got this one committed as of d03d754.
—
Michael
--
Best regards
Japin Li