Use boolean array for nulls parameters

Started by Japin Liover 5 years ago4 messageshackers
Beta feature

Hackorum builds and tests every patch posted to the lists, not only commitfest submissions. This is Hackorum's own CI rather than the PostgreSQL project's, and it is still under testing - please report anything that looks wrong.

won't retrysuccessCI history

You can run a PostgreSQL built from this patch straight from Docker, with no checkout and no build:

docker run --rm -p 5432:5432 ghcr.io/hackorum-dev/postgres-patch:t43567
psql -h localhost -U postgres

Built from patchset v1 (message #1), July 27, 2026 at 05:48 PM.

Every patchset is also pushed to a branch of our PostgreSQL fork, so you can check out the same tree CI built. Without a PostgreSQL checkout:

git clone --branch t43567_1 https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

In a checkout you already have, add the fork once:

git remote add hackorum https://github.com/hackorum-dev/postgres.git

then, for this patchset and every later one:

git fetch hackorum t43567_1 && git checkout t43567_1

Patchset v1 (message #1) is on t43567_1

Jump to latest
#1Japin Li
japinli@hotmail.com

Hi,

When I review the [1]/messages/by-id/CA+HiwqGkfJfYdeq5vHPh6eqPKjSbfpDDY+j-kXYFePQedtSLeg@mail.gmail.com, I find that the tuple's nulls array use char type.
However there are many places use boolean array to repsent the nulls array,
so I think we can replace the char type nulls array to boolean type. This
change will break the SPI_xxx API, I'm not sure whether this chagnges cause
other problems or not. Any thought?

[1]: /messages/by-id/CA+HiwqGkfJfYdeq5vHPh6eqPKjSbfpDDY+j-kXYFePQedtSLeg@mail.gmail.com

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

Attachments:

t43567_1
v1-0001-Replace-the-char-to-bool-array-for-null-parameter.patchtext/x-patchDownload+61-72
#2Hamid Akhtar
hamid.akhtar@gmail.com
In reply to: Japin Li (#1)
Re: Use boolean array for nulls parameters

I personally don't see any benefit in this change. The focus shouldn't be
on fixing things that aren't broken. Perhaps, there is more value in using
bitmap data type to keep track of NULL values, which is typical storage vs
performance debate, and IMHO, it's better to err on using slightly more
storage for much better performance. IIRC, the bitmap idea has previously
discussed been rejected too.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 7:07 PM japin <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

When I review the [1], I find that the tuple's nulls array use char type.
However there are many places use boolean array to repsent the nulls array,
so I think we can replace the char type nulls array to boolean type. This
change will break the SPI_xxx API, I'm not sure whether this chagnges cause
other problems or not. Any thought?

[1] -
/messages/by-id/CA+HiwqGkfJfYdeq5vHPh6eqPKjSbfpDDY+j-kXYFePQedtSLeg@mail.gmail.com

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

--
Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan)
URL : www.highgo.ca
ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC
CELL:+923335449950 EMAIL: mailto:hamid.akhtar@highgo.ca
SKYPE: engineeredvirus

#3Tom Lane
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
In reply to: Japin Li (#1)
Re: Use boolean array for nulls parameters

japin <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:

When I review the [1], I find that the tuple's nulls array use char type.
However there are many places use boolean array to repsent the nulls array,
so I think we can replace the char type nulls array to boolean type. This
change will break the SPI_xxx API, I'm not sure whether this chagnges cause
other problems or not. Any thought?

We have always considered that changing the APIs of published SPI
interfaces is a non-starter. The entire reason those calls still
exist at all is for the benefit of third-party extensions.

regards, tom lane

#4Japin Li
japinli@hotmail.com
In reply to: Tom Lane (#3)
Re: Use boolean array for nulls parameters

On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 23:45, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

japin <japinli@hotmail.com> writes:

When I review the [1], I find that the tuple's nulls array use char type.
However there are many places use boolean array to repsent the nulls array,
so I think we can replace the char type nulls array to boolean type. This
change will break the SPI_xxx API, I'm not sure whether this chagnges cause
other problems or not. Any thought?

We have always considered that changing the APIs of published SPI
interfaces is a non-starter. The entire reason those calls still
exist at all is for the benefit of third-party extensions.

Thanks for your clarify. I agree that we should keep the APIs stable, maybe we
can modify this in someday when the APIs must be changed.

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.