So, about that cast-to-typmod-minus-one business
We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]/messages/by-id/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ=uWWWfQ@mail.gmail.com. While updating the v14 release notes,
I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.
I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
in 14beta3. Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
[1]: /messages/by-id/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ=uWWWfQ@mail.gmail.com
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:06 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes,
I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
in 14beta3. Thoughts?regards, tom lane
[1]
/messages/by-id/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ=uWWWfQ@mail.gmail.comHi,
+1 to backporting.
Thanks
On Sat, 18 Sep 2021, 18:06 Tom Lane, <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I'm inclined to back-patch
+1
Regards,
Dean
Show quoted text
+1 backporting
Tony
Show quoted text
On 2021/9/19 01:06, Tom Lane wrote:
We had left it as an open issue whether or not to risk back-patching
5c056b0c2 into stable branches [1]. While updating the v14 release notes,
I realized that we can't put off that decision any longer, because we
have to decide now whether to document that as a new behavior in v14.I'm inclined to back-patch, since nobody has complained about this
in 14beta3. Thoughts?regards, tom lane
[1] /messages/by-id/CABNQVagu3bZGqiTjb31a8D5Od3fUMs7Oh3gmZMQZVHZ=uWWWfQ@mail.gmail.com