a comment in joinrel.c: compute_partition_bounds()
Hi,
I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
/*
* See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
* which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
* partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
* cardinal positions form the pairs.
": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
Attached a patch to fix.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachments:
comment-missing-word.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=comment-missing-word.patchDownload+2-2
Hi Amit-san,
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
/*
* See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
* which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
* partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
* cardinal positions form the pairs.": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
Attached a patch to fix.
Good catch! Will fix.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:20 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
/*
* See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
* which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
* partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
* cardinal positions form the pairs.": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
Attached a patch to fix.
Good catch! Will fix.
Rereading the comment, I think it would be better to add “will” to the
second part “the partitions with the same cardinal positions form the
pairs” as well. Updated patch attached.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
Attachments:
comment-missing-word-2.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=comment-missing-word-2.patchDownload+3-3
Fujita-san,
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:41 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:20 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
I think there's a word missing in the following comment:
/*
* See if the partition bounds for inputs are exactly the same, in
* which case we don't need to work hard: the join rel have the same
* partition bounds as inputs, and the partitions with the same
* cardinal positions form the pairs.": the join rel have the same..." seems to be missing a "will".
Attached a patch to fix.
Good catch! Will fix.
Rereading the comment, I think it would be better to add “will” to the
second part “the partitions with the same cardinal positions form the
pairs” as well. Updated patch attached.
No objection from my side.
Thank you.
--
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 12:05 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:41 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
Rereading the comment, I think it would be better to add “will” to the
second part “the partitions with the same cardinal positions form the
pairs” as well. Updated patch attached.No objection from my side.
Ok, pushed. Thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita