(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.
regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Attachments:
fix-tab-complete.patchtext/x-diff; name=fix-tab-complete.patchDownload
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
index 5cd5838668..12c55f5904 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
@@ -3599,39 +3599,49 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
COMPLETE_WITH("(");
/* LOCK */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] with a list of tables */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] with a list of tables */
else if (Matches("LOCK"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
- " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+
else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY") || Matches("LOCK", "ONLY"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
/* For the following, handle the case of a single table only for now */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> with "IN" */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE")) ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("IN");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> with "IN" or "NOWAIT" */
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE|ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAnyExcept("ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("IN", "NOWAIT");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN with a lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN with a lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN"))
COMPLETE_WITH("ACCESS SHARE MODE",
"ROW SHARE MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE",
"SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"EXCLUSIVE MODE", "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE][ONLY] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
COMPLETE_WITH("EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
- "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE", "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> [IN lockmode MODE] with "NOWAIT"*/
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("MODE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("NOWAIT");
/* NOTIFY --- can be inside EXPLAIN, RULE, etc */
else if (TailMatches("NOTIFY"))
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.
Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for
"LOCK ONLY <table-name> IN".
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
2021-09-28 16:36 に Fujii Masao さんは書きました:
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for
"LOCK ONLY <table-name> IN".
Thanks for your comment!
I attach a new patch fixed to this mail.
Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
2021-09-28 17:03 に bt21tanigaway さんは書きました:
2021-09-28 16:36 に Fujii Masao さんは書きました:
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for
"LOCK ONLY <table-name> IN".Thanks for your comment!
I attach a new patch fixed to this mail.Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Sorry, I forgot to attach patch file.
"fix-tab-complete2.patch" is fixed!
Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Attachments:
fix-tab-complete2.patchtext/x-diff; name=fix-tab-complete2.patchDownload
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
index 5cd5838668..251b2af9a5 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
@@ -3599,39 +3599,52 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
COMPLETE_WITH("(");
/* LOCK */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] with a list of tables */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] with a list of tables */
else if (Matches("LOCK"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
- " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+
else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY") || Matches("LOCK", "ONLY"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
/* For the following, handle the case of a single table only for now */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> with "IN" */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE")) ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("IN");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> with "IN" or "NOWAIT" */
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE|ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAnyExcept("ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("IN", "NOWAIT");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN with a lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN with a lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN"))
COMPLETE_WITH("ACCESS SHARE MODE",
"ROW SHARE MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE",
"SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"EXCLUSIVE MODE", "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE][ONLY] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
COMPLETE_WITH("EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
- "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE", "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> [IN lockmode MODE] with "NOWAIT"*/
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("MODE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("NOWAIT");
/* NOTIFY --- can be inside EXPLAIN, RULE, etc */
else if (TailMatches("NOTIFY"))
2021-09-28 17:06 に bt21tanigaway さんは書きました:
2021-09-28 17:03 に bt21tanigaway さんは書きました:
2021-09-28 16:36 に Fujii Masao さんは書きました:
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for
"LOCK ONLY <table-name> IN".Thanks for your comment!
I attach a new patch fixed to this mail.Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Sorry, I forgot to attach patch file.
"fix-tab-complete2.patch" is fixed!Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Thank you for your patch.
I have two comments.
1. When I executed git apply, an error occured.
---
$ git apply ~/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch
/home/penguin/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch:14: indent with spaces.
COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT
'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
---
2. The command "LOCK TABLE a, b;" can be executed, but tab-completion
doesn't work properly. Is it OK?
--
Regards,
--
Shinya Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
-----Original Message-----
From: bt21tanigaway <bt21tanigaway@oss.nttdata.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:06 PM
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>;
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: (LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet
implemented2021-09-28 17:03 に bt21tanigaway さんは書きました:
2021-09-28 16:36 に Fujii Masao さんは書きました:
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for "LOCK ONLY
<table-name> IN".Thanks for your comment!
I attach a new patch fixed to this mail.Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Sorry, I forgot to attach patch file.
"fix-tab-complete2.patch" is fixed!Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Thank you for your patch.
I have two comments.
1. When I executed git apply, an error occured.
---
$ git apply ~/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch
/home/penguin/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch:14: indent with spaces.
COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
---
2. The command "LOCK TABLE a, b;" can be executed, but tab-completion doesn't work properly. Is it OK?
--
Regards,
--
Shinya Kato
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
2021-09-28 22:55 に Shinya11.Kato@nttdata.com さんは書きました:
-----Original Message-----
From: bt21tanigaway <bt21tanigaway@oss.nttdata.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 5:06 PM
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>;
pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: (LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet
implemented2021-09-28 17:03 に bt21tanigaway さんは書きました:
2021-09-28 16:36 に Fujii Masao さんは書きました:
On 2021/09/28 16:13, bt21tanigaway wrote:
Hi,
(LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet implemented in
tab-complete. I made a patch for these options.Thanks for the patch!
The patch seems to forget to handle the tab-completion for "LOCK
ONLY
<table-name> IN".Thanks for your comment!
I attach a new patch fixed to this mail.Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Sorry, I forgot to attach patch file.
"fix-tab-complete2.patch" is fixed!Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Thank you for your patch.
I have two comments.1. When I executed git apply, an error occured.
---
$ git apply ~/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch
/home/penguin/Downloads/fix-tab-complete2.patch:14: indent with spaces.
COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION
SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
---
Thank you for your feedback.
I might have added whitespace when I was checking the patch file.
I attach a new patch to this mail.
2. The command "LOCK TABLE a, b;" can be executed, but tab-completion
doesn't work properly. Is it OK?
It's OK for now.
But it should be able to handle a case of multiple tables in the future.
Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
Attachments:
diff5.patchtext/x-diff; name=diff5.patchDownload
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
index 5cd5838668..eada1f453c 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
@@ -3599,39 +3599,52 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
COMPLETE_WITH("(");
/* LOCK */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] with a list of tables */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] with a list of tables */
else if (Matches("LOCK"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
- " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+
else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY") || Matches("LOCK", "ONLY"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
/* For the following, handle the case of a single table only for now */
-
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> with "IN" */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE")) ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("IN");
-
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN with a lock mode */
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> with "IN" or "NOWAIT" */
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE|ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAnyExcept("ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("IN", "NOWAIT");
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN with a lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN"))
COMPLETE_WITH("ACCESS SHARE MODE",
"ROW SHARE MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE",
"SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"EXCLUSIVE MODE", "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE][ONLY] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
COMPLETE_WITH("EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
- "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE", "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> [IN lockmode MODE] with "NOWAIT"*/
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("MODE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("NOWAIT");
/* NOTIFY --- can be inside EXPLAIN, RULE, etc */
else if (TailMatches("NOTIFY"))
Thank you for your feedback.
I might have added whitespace when I was checking the patch file.
I attach a new patch to this mail.
Thank you for the update!
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || - Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW")) + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
I think this code is redundant, so I change following.
---
else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
---
I created the patch, and attached it. Do you think?
2. The command "LOCK TABLE a, b;" can be executed, but tab-completion
doesn't work properly. Is it OK?It's OK for now.
But it should be able to handle a case of multiple tables in the future.
OK. I agreed.
Regards,
Shinya Kato
Attachments:
fix_tab_completion_of_lock.patchapplication/octet-stream; name=fix_tab_completion_of_lock.patchDownload
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
index 5cd5838668..6e7721e57f 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
@@ -3599,39 +3599,43 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
COMPLETE_WITH("(");
/* LOCK */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] with a list of tables */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] with a list of tables */
else if (Matches("LOCK"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
- " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'" " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+
else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY") || Matches("LOCK", "ONLY"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
/* For the following, handle the case of a single table only for now */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> with "IN" */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE")) ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("IN");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> with "IN" or "NOWAIT" */
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE|ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAnyExcept("ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("IN", "NOWAIT");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN with a lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN"))
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN with a lock mode */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN"))
COMPLETE_WITH("ACCESS SHARE MODE",
"ROW SHARE MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE",
"SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"EXCLUSIVE MODE", "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE][ONLY] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
COMPLETE_WITH("EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
- "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "SHARE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE", "UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> [IN lockmode MODE] with "NOWAIT"*/
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("MODE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("NOWAIT");
/* NOTIFY --- can be inside EXPLAIN, RULE, etc */
else if (TailMatches("NOTIFY"))
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || - Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW")) + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))I think this code is redundant, so I change following.
---
else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
---
I created the patch, and attached it. Do you think?
Thank you for update!
I think that your code is more concise than mine.
There seems to be no problem.
Regards,
Koyu Tanigawa
On 2021/10/04 11:17, bt21tanigaway wrote:
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || - Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW")) + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))I think this code is redundant, so I change following.
---
else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
---
I created the patch, and attached it. Do you think?Thank you for update!
I think that your code is more concise than mine.
There seems to be no problem.
The patch looks good to me, too. I applied cosmetic changes to it.
Attached is the updated version of the patch. Barring any objection,
I will commit it.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Attachments:
fix_tab_completion_of_lock_fujii.patchtext/plain; charset=UTF-8; name=fix_tab_completion_of_lock_fujii.patch; x-mac-creator=0; x-mac-type=0Download
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
index 5cd5838668..ecae9df8ed 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
@@ -3599,40 +3599,49 @@ psql_completion(const char *text, int start, int end)
COMPLETE_WITH("(");
/* LOCK */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] with a list of tables */
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] with a list of tables */
else if (Matches("LOCK"))
COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
- " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'");
+ " UNION SELECT 'TABLE'"
+ " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE"))
- COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, "");
-
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables,
+ " UNION SELECT 'ONLY'");
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY") || Matches("LOCK", "ONLY"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH_SCHEMA_QUERY(Query_for_list_of_tables, NULL);
/* For the following, handle the case of a single table only for now */
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> with "IN" */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE")) ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny))
- COMPLETE_WITH("IN");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> with IN or NOWAIT */
+ else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAnyExcept("TABLE|ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAnyExcept("ONLY")) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny) ||
+ Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("IN", "NOWAIT");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN with a lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN"))
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN with a lock mode */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN"))
COMPLETE_WITH("ACCESS SHARE MODE",
"ROW SHARE MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE",
"SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"EXCLUSIVE MODE", "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
+ /*
+ * Complete LOCK [TABLE][ONLY] <table> IN ACCESS|ROW with rest of lock
+ * mode
+ */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
COMPLETE_WITH("EXCLUSIVE MODE", "SHARE MODE");
- /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
- else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE") ||
- Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "SHARE"))
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> IN SHARE with rest of lock mode */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "SHARE"))
COMPLETE_WITH("MODE", "ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE",
"UPDATE EXCLUSIVE MODE");
+ /* Complete LOCK [TABLE] [ONLY] <table> [IN lockmode MODE] with "NOWAIT" */
+ else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("MODE"))
+ COMPLETE_WITH("NOWAIT");
+
/* NOTIFY --- can be inside EXPLAIN, RULE, etc */
else if (TailMatches("NOTIFY"))
COMPLETE_WITH_QUERY("SELECT pg_catalog.quote_ident(channel) FROM pg_catalog.pg_listening_channels() AS channel WHERE substring(pg_catalog.quote_ident(channel),1,%d)='%s'");
-----Original Message-----
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 1:59 PM
To: bt21tanigaway <bt21tanigaway@oss.nttdata.com>; RDH 加藤 慎也/Kato,
Shinya (NTT DATA) <Shinya11.Kato@jp.nttdata.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: (LOCK TABLE options) “ONLY” and “NOWAIT” are not yet
implementedOn 2021/10/04 11:17, bt21tanigaway wrote:
else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") || - Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW")) + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN","ACCESS|ROW")
+|| + Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN","ACCESS|ROW")
+|| + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", +"ACCESS|ROW"))I think this code is redundant, so I change following.
---
else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
---
I created the patch, and attached it. Do you think?Thank you for update!
I think that your code is more concise than mine.
There seems to be no problem.The patch looks good to me, too. I applied cosmetic changes to it.
Attached is the updated version of the patch. Barring any objection, I will commit
it.
Thank you for the patch!
It looks good to me.
Regards,
Shinya Kato
On 2021/10/04 14:28, Shinya11.Kato@nttdata.com wrote:
The patch looks good to me, too. I applied cosmetic changes to it.
Attached is the updated version of the patch. Barring any objection, I will commit
it.Thank you for the patch!
It looks good to me.
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION